Ensuring the success of IPBES: between interface, market place and parliament

作者: Katrin Vohland , Tahani Nadim

DOI: 10.1098/RSTB.2014.0012

关键词:

摘要: After years of protracted negotiations, the Intergovernmental science–policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) was finally established in 2012. One year on and we have already witnessed two plenary sessions which have, so far, defined procedures for nominating members for observatory and decision-making panels as well as experts and knowledge holders for the compilation of reports. The sessions also determined the work programme for the next 4 years (2014–2018). According to its internally formulated criteria, the success of IPBES will be determined by how credible, relevant and legitimate its institution and operations are. More specifically, these criteria suggest that success is contingent on the transparency of the processes within IPBES, the autonomy and quality of scientific knowledge, and the early integration of different stakeholders and diverse knowledge and value systems. Currently, we see IPBES encompassing open and integrative approaches as well as providing a convenient trading floor for particulate and opaque agendas formulated elsewhere. In any case, without the backing of large and effective publics the policy–support function of IPBES will be limited. Local capacity building and supporting communities to actively participate in research projects dealing with biodiversity are essential for furthering a practical and emancipatory understanding of the relationship between political and economic decisions, the state and functioning of biodiversity and ecosystems, and current and future human well-being.

参考文章(23)
Sheila Jasanoff, Marybeth Long Martello, Earthly politics : local and global in environmental governance MIT Press. ,(2004)
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis Island Press, Washington, DC. ,(2005)
Steven Shapin, Cordelia's Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science Perspectives on Science. ,(1995)
Lars Opgenoorth, Stefan Hotes, Harold Mooney, IPBES: biodiversity panel should play by rules. Nature. ,vol. 506, pp. 159- 159 ,(2014) , 10.1038/506159A
Dale S Rothman, Caroline van Bers, Jan Bakkes, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, How to make global assessments more effective: lessons from the assessment community Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. ,vol. 1, pp. 214- 218 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.COSUST.2009.09.002
Anne Larigauderie, Harold A Mooney, The International Year of Biodiversity: an opportunity to strengthen the science–policy interface for biodiversity and ecosystem services Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 2 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.COSUST.2010.04.001
Isabelle Stengers, Introductory notes on an ecology of practices Cultural studies review. ,vol. 11, pp. 183- 196 ,(2013) , 10.5130/CSR.V11I1.3459
Mike Hulme, Martin Mahony, Silke Beck, Christoph Görg, Bernd Hansjürgens, Jennifer Hauck, Carsten Nesshöver, Axel Paulsch, Marie Vandewalle, Heidi Wittmer, Stefan Böschen, Peter Bridgewater, Mariteuw Chimère Diaw, Pierre Fabre, Aurelia Figueroa, Kong Luen Heong, Horst Korn, Rik Leemans, Eva Lövbrand, Mohd Norowi Hamid, Chad Monfreda, Roger Pielke Jr, Josef Settele, Marten Winter, Alice BM Vadrot, Sybille Van den Hove, Jeroen P Van der Sluijs, Science-Policy Interface: Beyond Assessments Science. ,vol. 333, pp. 697- 698 ,(2011) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.333.6043.697