ICU protocol may affect the outcome of non-elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

作者: A.J.P. Sandison , D.L.A. Wyncoll , R.C. Edmondson , N. Van Heerden , R.J. Beale

DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80057-9

关键词:

摘要: Objectives: to compare the outcome of patients undergoing non-elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at two hospitals under care a single vascular surgeon. Design: prospective and retrospective audit 6 years emergency urgent infrarenal surgery. Setting: Lewisham North Southwark Health Authority. Subjects: one hundred forty-five who underwent (46) or (99) an aneurysm. Primary measure: hospital mortality. Secondary measures: acute renal failure, intensive length stay distal ischaemia return theatre. Results: mortality was higher 2 than 1 (28% vs. 9%, p =0.0068). There no significant difference in age, sex, cardiac history, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, impairment (all >0.05). operation time, blood loss base excess end surgery between groups APACHE II scores on admission ICU were similar (median 16 14, >0.03). Pulmonary artery catheters placed 18% compared with 96% 2. Patients received more crystalloid 2990 2300 ml ÷, colloid 4775 1500 ml), inotropes 0) those their first 24 h =0.12) yet incidence failure (30% 6%, p=0.001). survivors longer 3 days, =0.0018) as 17.5 12 =0.0002). Conclusions: both is least good other reported series, but it interesting note that which used less pulmonary intervention (in form inotropes) showed reduced These data may be important assessing different therapeutic strategies employed postoperatively ICU.

参考文章(13)
William C. Shoemaker, Physiologic Patterns in Surviving and Nonsurviving Shock Patients Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 106, pp. 630- 636 ,(1973) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1973.01350170004003
D. C. Berridge, J. Chamberlain, A. J. Guy, D. Lambert, , Prospective audit of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the northern region from 1988 to 1992 British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 82, pp. 906- 910 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800820716
W. Bruce Campbell, Mortality statistics for elective aortic aneurysms European Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 111- 113 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80673-5
Kimberly Dee Boyd, Stephen J. Thomas, Julian Gold, Arthur D. Boyd, A Prospective Study of Complications of Pulmonary Artery Catheterizations in 500 Consecutive Patients Chest. ,vol. 84, pp. 245- 249 ,(1983) , 10.1378/CHEST.84.3.245
F.C.W. Slootmans, J.A. van der Vliet, H.H.M. Reinaerts, S.F.S. van Roye, F.G.M. Buskens, Relaparotomies after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. European Journal of Vascular Surgery. ,vol. 8, pp. 342- 345 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80153-7
John Concato, Alvan R Feinstein, Theodore R Holford, The Risk of Determining Risk with Multivariable Models Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 118, pp. 201- 210 ,(1993) , 10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00009
WILLIAM A. KNAUS, ELIZABETH A. DRAPER, DOUGLAS P. WAGNER, JACK E. ZIMMERMAN, APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 818- 829 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009
William C. Shoemaker, Paul L. Appel, Harry B. Kram, Kenneth Waxman, Tai-Shion Lee, Prospective Trial of Supranormal Values of Survivors as Therapeutic Goals in High-Risk Surgical Patients Chest. ,vol. 94, pp. 1176- 1186 ,(1988) , 10.1378/CHEST.94.6.1176