Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.

作者: Luis Geraldo Vaz , Siegfried V. N. Jaecques , Joke Duyck , Elcio Marcantonio , Roberto S. Pessoa

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Purpose:To evaluate the influence of platform switching on biomechanical environment implants in different placement and loading protocols. Materials Methods:A computed tomography‐based finite element model a maxillary central incisor extraction socket was constructed containing conical 13-mm external-hex implant with 4.3-mm-diameter shoulder. Abutment models that were 4.3 mm 3.8 diameter then imported aligned to implant. The 4.3-mm abutment edge matched perfectly shoulder, while 3.8-mm assumed platformswitching configuration. Then, immediately placed, loaded, osseointegrated (ie, conventional delayed loaded) protocols simulated. Analysis variance used interpret data for peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) bone, bone-to-implant relative displacement, von Mises stress stress) screw, implant-abutment gap. Results: In same clinical situation, differences values assessed results minor abutments diameters. addition, no statistically significant seen any evaluated parameters, except although this observed rather low percentage. Nevertheless, slightly higher EQV screw all cases 3.8-mm-diameter abutment, not significant. Conclusion:Within limitation analysis, it can be concluded circumferential horizontal mismatch 0.5 does make an important contribution implants. Also, there seems drawback design rationale reducing move gap area away from implant-bone interface. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2010;25:911‐919

参考文章(52)
Young Kyu Shin, Sunjai Kim, Chong Hyun Han, Heoung Jae Chun, Seong Joo Heo, Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 21, pp. 789- 794 ,(2006)
Alison M. Fallgatter, Ching Chang Ko, Heng Li Huang, Jui Ting Hsu, Chin Han Chang, Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 22, pp. 551- 562 ,(2007)
Siegele D, Soltesz U, Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 4, pp. 333- ,(1989)
Cocchetto R, Celletti R, Luongo R, Cappiello M, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 28, pp. 347- 355 ,(2008)
Gabor Tepper, Robert Haas, Dieter Busenlechner, Nina Trinkl, Georg Watzek, Georg Watzak, Werner Zechner, Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 19, pp. 216- 221 ,(2004)
d'Hoedt B, Behneke N, Behneke A, The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 15, pp. 633- 645 ,(2000)
Richard J Lazzara, Stephan S Porter, Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 26, pp. 9- 17 ,(2006)
Hans Van Oosterwyck, Joke Duyck, Jos Vander Sloten, Georges Van der Perre, Michel De Coomans, Steve Lieven, Robert Puers, lgnace Naert, The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 407- 418 ,(1998) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.1996.090606.X
T. Berglundh, J. Lindhe, Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. ,vol. 23, pp. 971- 973 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1600-051X.1996.TB00520.X