Household Chemicals and Internet Based Products for Beating Urine Drug Tests

作者: Amitava Dasgupta

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-527-9_5

关键词:

摘要: People try to beat drug tests by adding various substances into urine specimens. Easily available household chemicals such as table salt, vinegar, lemon juice, bleach and liquid soap are a few examples of in vitro adulterants people use with hope beating tests. Most these interfere immunoassays used for screening drugs/metabolites However, all except Visine eye drops can be easily detected performing specimen integrity testing (pH, creatinine, temperature specific gravity) the specimen. In last 10–15 years many Internet based companies have been selling containing potassium nitrite, glutaraldehyde, pyridinium chlorochromate Stealth (a combination peroxidase hydrogen peroxide). These effective modifying structures certain drug/metabolites, especially marijuana metabolite, may cause false negative test results both immunoassay gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) confirmation. Unfortunately, presence compounds specimens cannot routine testing. special dipstick other order detect urine.

参考文章(35)
John T Cody, Sandra Valtier, A procedure for the detection of Stealth adulterant in urine samples. Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology. ,vol. 15, pp. 111- 115 ,(2002) , 10.29074/ASCLS.15.2.111
Kenneth E. Ferslew, Andrea N. Hagardorn, Timothy A. Robert, Capillary ion electrophoresis of endogenous anions and anionic adulterants in human urine. Journal of Forensic Sciences. ,vol. 46, pp. 615- 626 ,(2001) , 10.1520/JFS15013J
A Wu, J Schmalz, W Bennett, Identification of UrinAid-adulterated urine specimens by fluorometric analysis. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 40, pp. 845- 846 ,(1994) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/40.5.845
K K Kaistha, R Tadrus, Thin-layer chromatographic detection of quinine, morphine and poly-drugs. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 22, pp. 1936- 1937 ,(1976) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/22.11.1936
Alan H. B. Wu, Elaine Forte, Gina Casella, Kenneth Sun, Gary Hemphill, Robert Foery, Heidi Schanzenbach, CEDIA for Screening Drugs of Abuse in Urine and the Effect of Adulterants Journal of Forensic Sciences. ,vol. 40, pp. 614- 618 ,(1995) , 10.1520/JFS13836J
Cherylynn A Wium, Reinhard A Uebel, Toxicological screening for drugs of abuse in samples adulterated with household chemicals South African Medical Journal. ,vol. 92, pp. 547- 549 ,(2002)
B A Goldberger, Y H Caplan, Effect of glutaraldehyde (UrinAid) on detection of abused drugs in urine by immunoassay. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 40, pp. 1605- 1606 ,(1994) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/40.8.1605
Alan HB Wu, Ben Bristol, Karen Sexton, Gina Cassella-McLane, Verena Holtman, Dennis W Hill, Adulteration of urine by "Urine Luck". Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 45, pp. 1051- 1057 ,(1999) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/45.7.1051
S D Pearson, K O Ash, F M Urry, Mechanism of false-negative urine cannabinoid immunoassay screens by Visine eyedrops. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 35, pp. 636- 638 ,(1989) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/35.4.636
Amitava Dasgupta, Omar Chughtai, Christina Hannah, Bonnette Davis, Alice Wells, Comparison of spot tests with AdultaCheck 6 and Intect 7 urine test strips for detecting the presence of adulterants in urine specimens Clinica Chimica Acta. ,vol. 348, pp. 19- 25 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.CCCN.2004.01.003