Chronic exposure to odorous chemicals in residential areas and effects on human psychosocial health: Dose–response relationships

作者: Victoria Blanes-Vidal , Jesper Bælum , Esmaeil S. Nadimi , Per Løfstrøm , Lars P. Christensen

DOI: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2014.05.041

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Perceived air pollution, including environmental odor is known to be an stressor that affects individuals' psychosocial health and well-being. However, very few studies have been able quantify exposure–response associations based on individual-specific residential exposures a proxy gas examine the mechanisms underlying these associations. In this study, in non-urban environments during 2005–2010 released from animal biodegradable wastes (ammonia, NH 3 ) were calculated by Danish Eulerian long-range transport model local-scale deposition model. We used binomial multinomial logistic regression mediation analyses between average questionnaire-based data responses, after controlling for person-specific covariates. About 45% of respondents annoyed pollution. Exposures associated with annoyance (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ] = 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.33–5.39), risk perception (OR  = 4.94; CI = 1.95–12.5) behavioral interference  = 3.28; CI = 1.77–6.11), each unit increase log e (NH exposure). Annoyance was strong mediator exposure–behavior exposure–health relationships (81% 44% mediation, respectively). Health did not play mediating role exposure–annoyance or exposure–behavioral relationships. This first study provide quantitative estimation dose–response ambient effects caused pollution outdoor environments. It further shows are both direct mediated other responses. The results support use as epidemiologic studies.

参考文章(39)
Katja Radon, Anja Schulze, Vera Ehrenstein, Rob T. van Strien, Georg Praml, Dennis Nowak, Environmental exposure to confined animal feeding operations and respiratory health of neighboring residents. Epidemiology. ,vol. 18, pp. 300- 308 ,(2007) , 10.1097/01.EDE.0000259966.62137.84
Helena Chmura Kraemer, Michaela Kiernan, Marilyn Essex, David J. Kupfer, How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology. ,vol. 27, ,(2008) , 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(SUPPL.).S101
Steen Gyldenkærne, Carsten Ambelas Skjøth, Ole Hertel, Thomas Ellermann, A dynamical ammonia emission parameterization for use in air pollution models Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 110, ,(2005) , 10.1029/2004JD005459
Ginger Lockhart, David P. MacKinnon, Vanessa Ohlrich, Mediation analysis in psychosomatic medicine research. Psychosomatic Medicine. ,vol. 73, pp. 29- 43 ,(2011) , 10.1097/PSY.0B013E318200A54B
C. Geels, H. V. Andersen, C. Ambelas Skjøth, J. H. Christensen, T. Ellermann, P. Løfstrøm, S. Gyldenkærne, J. Brandt, K. M. Hansen, L. M. Frohn, O. Hertel, Improved modelling of atmospheric ammonia over Denmark using the coupled modelling system DAMOS Biogeosciences. ,vol. 9, pp. 2625- 2647 ,(2012) , 10.5194/BG-9-2625-2012
P.M. Cavalini, L.G. Koeter-Kemmerling, M.P.J. Pulles, Coping with odour annoyance and odour concentrations: Three field studies Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 11, pp. 123- 142 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80072-6
V. Blanes-Vidal, M.N. Hansen, A.P.S. Adamsen, A. Feilberg, S.O. Petersen, B.B. Jensen, Characterization of odor released during handling of swine slurry: Part I. Relationship between odorants and perceived odor concentrations Atmospheric Environment. ,vol. 43, pp. 2997- 3005 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2008.10.016
K. Sucker, R. Both, G. Winneke, Review of adverse health effects of odours in field studies. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 59, pp. 1281- 1289 ,(2009) , 10.2166/WST.2009.113
Susan Folkman, An approach to the measurement of coping Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,vol. 3, pp. 95- 107 ,(1982) , 10.1002/JOB.4030030108