Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

作者: Fabio Parazzini , Carlo La Vecchia , Eva Negri , Luigi Fedele , Silvia Franceschi

DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920501)69:9<2276::AID-CNCR2820690912>3.0.CO;2-Q

关键词:

摘要: To evaluate risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), data were collected in a case-control study based on 366 patients (58 with CIN class 1, 70 2, and 238 3) 323 control subjects normal smears interviewed selected days at the same screening clinics where cases had been identified. No relationship emerged between indicators of socioeconomic status (education social class) mild/moderate (considered together) severe dysplasia. A total 55 (43%) 1 or 107 (45%) 3, 94 (29%) controls current smokers. The corresponding relative (RR) estimates versus never smokers 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 3.0) 2 2.5 CI 1.7 3.6) increased number cigarettes smoked per day. was observed oral contraceptive use, parity, spontaneous induced abortions CIN, but tended report earlier age first birth than subjects. Compared women reporting their before 20 years, 0.5 0.4, respectively, 3 24 years age. 0.6 those 25 later, trends not statistically significant. sexual partners directly associated both histopathologic subgroups. no intercourse after 22 age, 18 RR estimate 2.3 2.4, being This confirms considerable similarities epidemiology In addition, it suggests consistency invasive that are likely act one stages process carcinogenesis (i.e., indications habits) differences hormone-mediated reproductive variables contraceptives).

参考文章(32)
H A Kahn, The Dorn study of smoking and mortality among U.S. veterans: report on eight and one-half years of observation National Cancer Institute monograph. ,vol. 19, pp. 1- 125 ,(1966)
Ross L. Prentice, David B. Thomas, On The Epidemiology of Oral Contraceptives and Disease Advances in Cancer Research. ,vol. 49, pp. 285- 401 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60801-5
R M Richart, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathology. ,vol. 8, pp. 301- 328 ,(1973)
Frank R. Smith, Etiologic factors in carcinoma of the cervix American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 21, pp. 18- 25 ,(1931) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(31)90837-5
JACQUES BRISSON, MICHEL ROY, MICHEL FORTIER, CELINE BOUCHARD, ALEXANDRE MEISELS, CONDYLOMA AND INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 128, pp. 337- 342 ,(1988) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A114973
Multistage Models and Primary Prevention of Cancer Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 64, pp. 977- 989 ,(1980) , 10.1093/JNCI/64.4.977
Malcolm Coppleson, Bevan L. Reid, A COLOPOSCOPIC STUDY OF THE CERVIX DURING PREGNANCY AND THE PUERPERIUM British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 73, pp. 575- 585 ,(1966) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1966.TB15536.X
Edwin Trevathan, Peter Layde, Linda A Webster, Jacob B Adams, Benedict B Benigno, Howard Ory, Cigarette Smoking and Dysplasia and Carcinoma In Situ of the Uterine Cervix JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 250, pp. 499- 502 ,(1983) , 10.1001/JAMA.1983.03340040039028
Fabio Parazzini, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia, Luigi Fedele, Barrier methods of contraception and the risk of cervical neoplasia Contraception. ,vol. 40, pp. 519- 530 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90125-X