Process evaluation of the maudsley model for treatment of adults with anorexia nervosa trial. Part II: Patient experiences of two psychological therapies for treatment of anorexia nervosa.

作者: Anna Lose , Charlotte Davies , Beth Renwick , Martha Kenyon , Janet Treasure

DOI: 10.1002/ERV.2279

关键词:

摘要: Objective This study is the second part of a process evaluation, embedded in MOSAIC study, large randomised controlled trial comparing two different psychological therapies, Maudsley Model for Treatment Adults with Anorexia Nervosa (MANTRA) and Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM). The adopted qualitative approach to examine patient experiences treatments. Method Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified-Anorexia type patients, transcripts analysed thematically. Results Patient responses yielded five main themes: positive helpful aspects, beneficial outcomes, less possible improvements treatments, therapeutic external environment. findings show clear differences some overlaps between patients' views on MANTRA SSCM. Discussion Both therapies experienced by patients as credible largely helpful, albeit ways. These results are agreement those therapists' these treatments. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Disorders Association.

参考文章(26)
Daniella Waterman-Collins, Beth Renwick, Anna Lose, Martha Kenyon, Lucy Serpell, Lorna Richards, Nicky Boughton, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt, , Process evaluation of the MOSAIC Trial, Part I: Therapist experiences of delivering two psychological therapies for treatment of anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review. ,vol. 22, pp. 122- 130 ,(2014) , 10.1002/ERV.2278
V. C. Sánchez-Ortiz, J. House, C. Munro, J. Treasure, H. Startup, C. Williams, U. Schmidt, "A computer isn't gonna judge you": a qualitative study of users' views of an internet-based cognitive behavioural guided self-care treatment package for bulimia nervosa and related disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders-studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. ,vol. 16, ,(2011) , 10.1007/BF03325314
A. Kuper, L. Lingard, W. Levinson, Critically appraising qualitative research BMJ. ,vol. 337, pp. 1035- ,(2008) , 10.1136/BMJ.A1035
Natalie Pretorius, Laura Rowlands, Susan Ringwood, Ulrike Schmidt, Young people's perceptions of and reasons for accessing a web-based cognitive behavioural intervention for bulimia nervosa European Eating Disorders Review. ,vol. 18, pp. 197- 206 ,(2010) , 10.1002/ERV.985
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 77- 101 ,(2006) , 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Marie Reid, Jennifer Burr, Sarah Williams, Richard Hammersley, Eating Disorders Patients' Views on Their Disorders and on an Outpatient Service A Qualitative Study Journal of Health Psychology. ,vol. 13, pp. 956- 960 ,(2008) , 10.1177/1359105308095070
Virginia V. W. McIntosh, Jennifer Jordan, Suzanne E. Luty, Frances A. Carter, Janice M. McKenzie, Cynthia M. Bulik, Peter R. Joyce, Specialist supportive clinical management for anorexia nervosa International Journal of Eating Disorders. ,vol. 39, pp. 625- 632 ,(2006) , 10.1002/EAT.20297
Christopher G. Fairburn, Zafra Cooper, Helen A. Doll, Marianne E. O'Connor, Robert L. Palmer, Riccardo Dalle Grave, Enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy for adults with anorexia nervosa: A UK–Italy study Behaviour Research and Therapy. ,vol. 51, ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BRAT.2012.09.010
Michael J. Crawford, Timothy Weaver, Deborah Rutter, Tom Sensky, Peter Tyrer, Evaluating new treatments in psychiatry: The potential value of combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. International Review of Psychiatry. ,vol. 14, pp. 6- 11 ,(2002) , 10.1080/09540260120114005
Carrie-Anne McClay, Louise Waters, Ciaran McHale, Ulrike Schmidt, Christopher Williams, Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Bulimic Type Disorders, Delivered in the Community by a Nonclinician: Qualitative Study Journal of Medical Internet Research. ,vol. 15, ,(2013) , 10.2196/JMIR.2083