Building Design for safety and sustainability

作者: Tsimplokoukou Kassiani , Lamperti Tornaghi Marco , Negro Paolo

DOI: 10.2788/338223

关键词:

摘要: The issue of sustainability in the building industry is prominent, as this causes large impacts on environment but also it contributes greatly a socioeconomic perspective growth. In line with purpose report twofold: to provide comprehensive description current state-of-the-art assessment methods and contribute towards design optimisation through introduction approach. first part role environmental footprint schemes ascertaining examined, deeper analysis Footprint introduced by European Commission. an product-level However, better described process than product, while taking into account interactions involved life-cycle seems insufficient consider components isolation. Current evaluate buildings over their at later stage indication performance. sole aspect performance cannot comparable solutions, information be effectively used general process. A more effective way achieving issues early stage, where principles durability, probabilistic reliability safety structures are involved. Since these parameters parts same whole they need addressed together. To move sustainability, new integrated-design approach deemed essential that allows multi-performance perspective. second part, Sustainable Structural Design (SSD) methodology presented based structural Emphasis put integrating results performance, which treated manner simplified PerformanceBased Assessment method. global parameter result expressed costs repair downtime losses obtained, different stakeholder categories make decisions multi-dimensional final devoted further research insights. Both EU framework resource efficiency communication opportunities sector discussed.

参考文章(55)
Curt Haselton, Judith Mitrani-Reiser, Gregory Deierlein, Keith Porter, Christine Goulet, James Beck, Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced-Concrete Frame Building – Part II: Loss Estimation 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2006. pp. 4599- 4608 ,(2006)
Barbara Rossi, Discussion on the use of stainless steel in constructions in view of sustainability Thin-walled Structures. ,vol. 83, pp. 182- 189 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TWS.2014.01.021
Matthias Buyle, Johan Braet, Amaryllis Audenaert, Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 26, pp. 379- 388 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2013.05.001
R. Doug Hooton, John A. Bickley, Design for durability: The key to improving concrete sustainability Construction and Building Materials. ,vol. 67, pp. 422- 430 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.12.016
Peng Wu, Bo Xia, Josua Pienaar, Xianbo Zhao, The past, present and future of carbon labelling for construction materials – A review Building and Environment. ,vol. 77, pp. 160- 168 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2014.03.023
William E. Rees, Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out: Environment and Urbanization. ,vol. 4, pp. 121- 130 ,(1992) , 10.1177/095624789200400212
Fulvio Ardente, Fabrice Mathieux, Environmental assessment of the durability of energy-using products: method and application Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 74, pp. 62- 73 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.03.049
K. Fujita, I. Takewaki, Sustainable building design under uncertain structural-parameter environment in seismic-prone countries Sustainable Cities and Society. ,vol. 1, pp. 142- 151 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.SCS.2011.07.001
Seymour M.J. Spence, Massimiliano Gioffrè, Large scale reliability-based design optimization of wind excited tall buildings Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. ,vol. 28, pp. 206- 215 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.PROBENGMECH.2011.08.001
Rob Hoogmartens, Steven Van Passel, Karel Van Acker, Maarten Dubois, Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 48, pp. 27- 33 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2014.05.001