Higher potency statins and the risk of new diabetes: multicentre, observational study of administrative databases

作者: C. R. Dormuth , K. B. Filion , J. M. Paterson , M. T. James , G. F. Teare

DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.G3244

关键词:

摘要: Objective To evaluate the incremental increase in new onset diabetes from higher potency statins compared with lower when used for secondary prevention. Design Eight population based cohort studies and a meta-analysis. Setting Six Canadian provinces two international databases UK US. Participants 136 966 patients aged ≥40 years newly treated between 1 January 1997 31 March 2011. Methods Within each of prescribed statin after hospitalisation major cardiovascular event or procedure, we performed as-treated, nested case-control analyses to compare incidence users statins. Rate ratios events were estimated using conditional logistic regression on different lengths exposure versus statins; adjustment confounding was achieved high dimensional propensity scores. Meta-analytic methods estimate overall effects across sites. Main outcome measures Hospitalisation diabetes, prescription insulin an oral antidiabetic drug. Results In first regular use, observed significant risk agents (rate ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.05 1.26). The seemed be highest four months use 1.26, 1.07 1.47). Conclusions Higher is associated moderate prevention disease. Clinicians should consider this prescribing patients.

参考文章(24)
Vidal Essebag, Robert W Platt, Michal Abrahamowicz, Louise Pilote, Comparison of nested case-control and survival analysis methodologies for analysis of time-dependent exposure BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 5, pp. 5- 5 ,(2005) , 10.1186/1471-2288-5-5
Kang-Ling Wang, Chia-Jen Liu, Tze-Fan Chao, Su-Jung Chen, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Chi-Ming Huang, Chun-Chin Chang, Ko-Fan Wang, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Shing-Jong Lin, Chern-En Chiang, Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus Versus Reduction in Cardiovascular Events With Statin Therapy American Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 113, pp. 631- 636 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.AMJCARD.2013.10.043
Sebastian Schneeweiss, Jeremy A. Rassen, Robert J. Glynn, Jerry Avorn, Helen Mogun, M Alan Brookhart, High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data Epidemiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 512- 522 ,(2009) , 10.1097/EDE.0B013E3181A663CC
A. A. Carter, T. Gomes, X. Camacho, D. N. Juurlink, B. R. Shah, M. M. Mamdani, Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: population based study BMJ. ,vol. 346, ,(2013) , 10.1136/BMJ.F2610
Alexandre Ouattara, Hamina Benhaoua, Yannick Le Manach, Nejma Mabrouk-Zerguini, Omar Itani, Amer Osman, Marc Landi, Bruno Riou, Pierre Coriat, Perioperative statin therapy is associated with a significant and dose-dependent reduction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. ,vol. 23, pp. 633- 638 ,(2009) , 10.1053/J.JVCA.2009.02.008
Chih-Wei Chen, Ting-Chang Chen, Kuang-Yung Huang, Pesus Chou, Pin-Fan Chen, Ching-Chih Lee, Differential Impact of Statin on New-Onset Diabetes in Different Age Groups: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Women from an Asian Country PLoS ONE. ,vol. 8, pp. e71817- ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0071817
JJ Brugts, T Yetgin, SE Hoeks, AM Gotto, J Shepherd, RGJ Westendorp, AJM De Craen, RH Knopp, H Nakamura, P Ridker, Ron van Domburg, JW Deckers, None, The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ. ,vol. 338, ,(2009) , 10.1136/BMJ.B2376
J. E. Hux, F. Ivis, V. Flintoft, A. Bica, Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care. ,vol. 25, pp. 512- 516 ,(2002) , 10.2337/DIACARE.25.3.512
Kausik K Ray, Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai, Sebhat Erqou, Peter Sever, J Wouter Jukema, Ian Ford, Naveed Sattar, Statins and All-Cause Mortality in High-Risk Primary Prevention: A Meta-analysis of 11 Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 65 229 Participants JAMA Internal Medicine. ,vol. 170, pp. 1024- 1031 ,(2010) , 10.1001/ARCHINTERNMED.2010.182