Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis

作者: Reed AC Siemieniuk , Jessica J Bartoszko , Dena Zeraatkar , Elena Kum , Anila Qasim

DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.M2980

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objective To compare the effects of treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Design Living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources WHO covid-19 database, a comprehensive multilingual source global literature, up to 3 December 2020 six additional Chinese databases 12 November 2020. Study selection Randomised clinical trials in which people with suspected, probable, or confirmed were randomised drug treatment standard care placebo. Pairs reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles. Methods After duplicate data abstraction, bayesian meta-analysis was conducted. Risk bias included studies assessed using modification Cochrane risk 2.0 tool, certainty evidence grading recommendations assessment, development evaluation (GRADE) approach. For each outcome, interventions classified groups from most least beneficial harmful following GRADE guidance. Results 85 enrolling 41 669 patients met inclusion criteria as 21 October 2020; 50 (58.8%) 25 081 (60.2%) are new previous iteration; 43 (50.6%) evaluating at 100 20 events threshold analyses. Compared care, corticosteroids probably reduce death (risk difference 17 fewer per 1000 patients, 95% credible interval 34 1 more, moderate certainty), mechanical ventilation (29 54 days free (2.6 fewer, 0.2 5.0 certainty). The impact remdesivir on mortality, ventilation, length hospital stay, duration symptoms is uncertain, but it does not substantially increase adverse leading discontinuation (0 more 1000, 9 40 Azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon-beta, tocilizumab may have an effect any other patient-important outcome. all low very low. Conclusion Corticosteroids mortality compared whereas azithromycin, either. Whether confers benefit remains uncertain. Systematic registration This registered. protocol supplement. Readers’ note article living that will be updated reflect emerging evidence. Updates occur two years date original publication. version second update published 30 July (BMJ 2020;370:m2980), versions can found supplements. When citing this paper please consider adding number access clarity.

参考文章(222)
Brian Hutton, Georgia Salanti, Deborah M. Caldwell, Anna Chaimani, Christopher H. Schmid, Chris Cameron, John P.A. Ioannidis, Sharon Straus, Kristian Thorlund, Jeroen P. Jansen, Cynthia Mulrow, Ferrán Catalá-López, Peter C. Gøtzsche, Kay Dickersin, Isabelle Boutron, Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 162, pp. 777- 784 ,(2015) , 10.7326/M14-2385
Rebecca M. Turner, Dan Jackson, Yinghui Wei, Simon G. Thompson, Julian P. T. Higgins, Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 34, pp. 984- 998 ,(2015) , 10.1002/SIM.6381
Gert Valkenhoef, Sofia Dias, A. E. Ades, Nicky J. Welton, Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 7, pp. 80- 93 ,(2016) , 10.1002/JRSM.1167
Gordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Vist, Regina Kunz, Jan Brozek, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Victor Montori, Elie A Akl, Ben Djulbegovic, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Susan L Norris, John W Williams Jr, David Atkins, Joerg Meerpohl, Holger J Schünemann, GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 407- 415 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.07.017
Jan O. Friedrich, Neill K.J. Adhikari, Joseph Beyene, Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 556- 564 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.09.016
Anna Chaimani, Julian P. T. Higgins, Dimitris Mavridis, Panagiota Spyridonos, Georgia Salanti, Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA PLoS ONE. ,vol. 8, pp. e76654- 12 ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0076654
M. A. Puhan, H. J. Schunemann, M. H. Murad, T. Li, R. Brignardello-Petersen, J. A. Singh, A. G. Kessels, G. H. Guyatt, , A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis BMJ. ,vol. 349, ,(2014) , 10.1136/BMJ.G5630
Per Olav Vandvik, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Gordon H. Guyatt, Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews? BMC Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 59- 59 ,(2016) , 10.1186/S12916-016-0596-4
Reed A Siemieniuk, Thomas Agoritsas, Helen Macdonald, Gordon H Guyatt, Linn Brandt, Per O Vandvik, None, Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations BMJ. ,vol. 354, ,(2016) , 10.1136/BMJ.I5191
Iain J. Marshall, Anna Noel-Storr, Joël Kuiper, James Thomas, Byron C. Wallace, Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 9, pp. 602- 614 ,(2018) , 10.1002/JRSM.1287