How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: implications for monitoring systems

作者: G Salvini , M Herold , V De Sy , G Kissinger , M Brockhaus

DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074004

关键词:

摘要: Countries participating in the REDD+ scheme are readiness phase, designing policy interventions to address drivers of deforestation and forest degradation (DD). In order for be effective, it is essential that they take into account specific aim address. Moreover crucial design systems monitor effectiveness planned interventions. this article we provide a comprehensive comparative assessment proposed by 43 countries 98 documents. We summarize types assess if formulated referring DD aiming Based on consider implications monitoring Most reviewed link DD. The majority making have better driver data quality, particularly those present their ratio or ordinal terms. Proposed focus not only activities reduce deforestation, but also other related such as sustainable management, which enhance stocks. Moreover, driver-specific often relate inside outside sector. Hence suggest need rates through remote sensing, carbon stock changes within forest, using more detailed ground level surveys measurements. addition, performance monitored, even impacts these cannot linked locations.

参考文章(34)
Dkamela G.P., Le contexte de la REDD+ au Cameroun: Causes, agents et institutions Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ,(2011) , 10.17528/CIFOR/003360
A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. ,(2012)
Brockhaus M., Di Gregorio M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Guide for country profiles: Global Comparative Study on REDD (GCS-REDD) Component 1 on National REDD+ Policies and Processes Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ,(2012) , 10.17528/CIFOR/003859
M. Di Gregorio, E. Muharrom, T. Cronin, M. Brockhaus, Politics and power in national REDD+ policy processes Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. ,(2012)
M. Herold, V. de Sy, G.M. Kissinger, Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers The Government of the UK and Norway,. ,(2012)
K. Lininger, S. Roquemore, E. Saxon, P. Elias, C. May-Tobin, D. Boucher, The root of the problem: what's driving tropical deforestation today? The root of the problem: what's driving tropical deforestation today?. ,(2011)
Arild Angelsen, David Kaimowitz, Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation ,(2001)
May P.H., Millikan B., Gebara M.F., The context of REDD+ in Brazil: Drivers, agents, and institutions CIFOR Occasional Paper. ,(2011) , 10.17528/CIFOR/003287
J.H. Ainembabazi, L.V. Verchot, A. Angelsen, M. Herold, A. Wijaya, A stepwise framework for developing REDD+ reference levels Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. pp. 279- 299 ,(2012)
Finn Danielsen, Margaret Skutsch, Neil D Burgess, Per Moestrup Jensen, Herizo Andrianandrasana, Bhaskar Karky, Richard Lewis, Jon C Lovett, John Massao, Yonika Ngaga, Pushkin Phartiyal, Michael Køie Poulsen, SP Singh, Silvia Solis, Marten Sørensen, Ashish Tewari, Richard Young, Eliakimu Zahabu, None, At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conservation Letters. ,vol. 4, pp. 158- 167 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00159.X