Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders innon-human primates.

作者: Carolyn P Neuhaus

DOI: 10.1136/MEDETHICS-2016-104088

关键词:

摘要: Non-human animal models of human diseases advance our knowledge the genetic underpinnings disease and lead to development novel therapies for humans. While mice are most common model organisms, their usefulness is limited. Larger animals may provide more accurate valuable models, but it has, until recently, been challenging create large models. Genome editors, such as Clustered Randomised Interspersed Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR), meet some these challenges bring routine genome engineering larger non-human primates (NHPs) well within reach. There growing interest in creating NHP brain disorders autism, depression Alzheimer's, which very difficult or study other including New treatments desperately needed this set disorders. This paper asking: Insofar NHPs being considered use organisms disorders, can be done ethically? The concludes that cannot. Notwithstanding ongoing debate about NHPs' moral status, (1) welfare concerns, (2) availability alternative methods studying (3) unmet expectations benefit justify a stop on creation lure using new technologies combined with promise therapeutics presents formidable challenge those who call slow, careful, only necessary research involving NHPs. But researchers should not macaques social deficits capuchin monkeys memory just because they can.

参考文章(27)
Carl Erik Fisher, Laura B. Dunn, Paul P. Christopher, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Yan Leykin, Helen S. Mayberg, Sarah H. Lisanby, Paul S. Appelbaum, The ethics of research on deep brain stimulation for depression: decisional capacity and therapeutic misconception Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 1265, pp. 69- 79 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1749-6632.2012.06596.X
Grace Lee, Ethical issues in behavioral neuroscience Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. ,vol. 19, pp. 135- 136 ,(2015) , 10.1007/7854_2014_343
Carl Elliott, Caring About Risks Archives of General Psychiatry. ,vol. 54, pp. 113- 116 ,(1997) , 10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1997.01830140021003
David DeGrazia, Moral Status As a Matter of Degree? The Southern Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 46, pp. 181- 198 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.2041-6962.2008.TB00075.X
F. S. Collins, Reengineering Translational Science: The Time Is Right Science Translational Medicine. ,vol. 3, ,(2011) , 10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.3002747
Scott YH Kim, Eric D Caine, Glenn W Currier, Adrian Leibovici, J Michael Ryan, None, Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer's disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. American Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 158, pp. 712- 717 ,(2001) , 10.1176/APPI.AJP.158.5.712
Ruth Faden, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little, The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics. ,vol. 1, pp. 5- 22 ,(2008) , 10.1353/IJF.0.0047
S. Matthew Liao, The basis of human moral status Journal of Moral Philosophy. ,vol. 7, pp. 159- 179 ,(2010) , 10.1163/174552409X12567397529106
Steve Perrin, Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work Nature. ,vol. 507, pp. 423- 425 ,(2014) , 10.1038/507423A