Consistency of Sperm Morphology Classification Methods

作者: R. O. Davis , C. G. Gravance

DOI: 10.1002/J.1939-4640.1994.TB01690.X

关键词:

摘要: : The World Health Organization (WHO) recently suggested new morphometric dimensions for normal sperm heads and head classification rules. These specifications differ from previous WHO methods the Kruger method strict morphology assessment. We analyzed rules to determine their appropriateness as predictive linear models. reviewed theoretical requirements allometric modeling, a more traditional approach specifying size relationships between phenotypic characters, developed valid models based on statistical properties of over 3,700 measurements individual dimensions. implemented WHO, Kruger, Allometric same set digitized study empirical consequences different metric methods. Results show that are internally consistent, but specify nonconstant variance. Hence, they inappropriate were consistent specified constant appropriate Significant differences found in percentage On average, produced lowest value significantly higher values than methods, no average difference was or Nevertheless, did change specimens. results indicate small can dramatically sperm. Until rig-orous definitions features be developed, used describe population characteristics fertile sperm, prognostic is limited.

参考文章(39)
Clarke Gn, Baker Hw, Sperm morphology: consistency of assessment of the same sperm by different observers. Clinical reproduction and fertility. ,vol. 5, pp. 37- 43 ,(1987)
Christina Wang, Andrew Leung, Wai-Loong Tsoi, Joanne Leung, Victor Ng, Kam-Fai Lee, Steven Y.W. Chan, Computer-assisted assessment of human sperm morphology: usefulness in predicting fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 55, pp. 989- 993 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54311-8
Christina Wang, Andrew Leung, Wai-Loong Tsoi, Joanne Leung, Victor Ng, Kam-Fai Lee, Steven Y.W. Chan, Computer-assisted assessment of human sperm morphology: comparison with visual assessment Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 55, pp. 983- 988 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54310-6
M Freund, Standards for the rating of human sperm morphology. A cooperative study. International Journal of Fertility. ,vol. 11, pp. 97- 180 ,(1966)
James W. Overstreet, Michael J. Price, William F. Blazak, Ernest L. Lewis, David F. Katz, Simultaneous Assessment of Human Sperm Motility and Morphology by Videomicrography The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 126, pp. 357- 360 ,(1981) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)54525-5
Russell O. Davis, David E. Bain, Rebecca J. Siemers, David M. Thal, Jane B. Andrew, Curtis G. Gravance, Accuracy and precision of the CellForm-Human * automated sperm morphometry instrument † ‡ Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 58, pp. 763- 769 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55325-4
R. O. Davis, S. P. Boyers, The role of digital image analysis in reproductive biology and medicine. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 116, pp. 351- 363 ,(1992)
Eric R. Ziegel, John Neter, William Wasserman, Michael Kutner, Applied Linear Statistical Models Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 34, pp. 1126- ,(1986) , 10.2307/1269588