A framework for measuring sustainability outcomes for landscape investments

作者: Baral H. , Holmgren P.

DOI: 10.17528/CIFOR/005761

关键词:

摘要: Rapidly increasing demand for food and agricultural non-food products to meet the demands of rising populations with new consumption patterns have worrying implications sustainability many ecosystems globally. Landscape approaches are often promoted as a win-win solution reducing harmful impacts development – means balance social needs economic performance, while maintaining ecological function. In this respect, landscape that address multiple sector needs, including agriculture, production forestry conservation, identified significant opportunity contribute United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, assessing verifying outcomes across broad, diverse dynamic landscapes is challenging, mainly because lack pragmatic standardized assessment measurement in cost-effective ways. This paper aims advance concept sustainable development, ways assess performance leverage scaling-up investment achieving SDGs other goals.Tools indicators used measure reviewed context investments, identify high performing parameters associated measurable indicators. Considerations include seeking applicable any type or size landscape, within short time-scale resource constraints. Based on these requirements, we develop present framework four universally important parameters: (i) livelihoods; (ii) ecosystem services; (iii) efficient use; (iv) products. will be useful assist measuring designed setting. We elaborate readily each parameter group. Linkages between discussed.

参考文章(83)
Jacques Gignoux, Ian D. Davies, Shayne R. Flint, Jean-Daniel Zucker, The Ecosystem in Practice: Interest and Problems of an Old Definition for Constructing Ecological Models Ecosystems. ,vol. 14, pp. 1039- 1054 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10021-011-9466-2
David Tilman, Stephen Polasky, Clarence Lehman, Diversity, productivity and temporal stability in the economies of humans and nature Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 49, pp. 405- 426 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JEEM.2004.03.008
Gary R. Sands, Terence H. Podmore, A generalized environmental sustainability index for agricultural systems Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 79, pp. 29- 41 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00147-4
Russell D. Warman, Global wood production from natural forests has peaked Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 23, pp. 1063- 1078 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S10531-014-0633-6
Grace T. R. LIN, Chris HOPE, GENUINE SAVINGS MEASUREMENT AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE UNITED KINGDOM AND TAIWAN Developing Economies. ,vol. 42, pp. 3- 41 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1746-1049.2004.TB01014.X
K. Freerk Wiersum, 200 Years of Sustainability in Forestry: Lessons from History Environmental Management. ,vol. 19, pp. 321- 329 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02471975
J.W. Hansen, Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 50, pp. 117- 143 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S
Lilibeth Acosta-Michlik, Wolfgang Lucht, Alberte Bondeau, Tim Beringer, Integrated assessment of sustainability trade-offs and pathways for global bioenergy production: Framing a novel hybrid approach Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 15, pp. 2791- 2809 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2011.02.011
N. Wang, M. Kosinski, D. J. Stillwell, J. Rust, Can Well-Being be Measured Using Facebook Status Updates? Validation of Facebook’s Gross National Happiness Index Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 115, pp. 483- 491 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11205-012-9996-9
Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, The GDP paradox Journal of Economic Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 117- 135 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JOEP.2008.12.001