Gravity model improvement using Geos 3 (GEM 9 and 10)

作者: Fancis J. Lerch , Steven M. Klosko , Roy E. Laubscher , Carl A. Wagner

DOI: 10.1029/JB084IB08P03897

关键词:

摘要: The spaceborne altimeter missions of Geos 3 (50-cm accuracy) and the future Seasat (10-cm require precise knowledge radial position spacecraft to be most-effective. Though errors in previous gravity models have produced large uncertainties orbital 3, significant improvement has been obtained with new geopotential solutions, Goddard Earth Model (GEM) 9 10. solution for GEM was derived by combining laser data from Lageos, Starlette; S band measurements on Landsat 1; 26 other satellites used solutions. 10 is a combination containing global set surface anomalies along 9. Radial 5-day arcs reduced about 5 m 1 basis intercomparisons, station navigations, analyses employing crossover points passes altimetry. use highly accurate constrained least squares permitted larger field than satellite models, having harmonics complete 20 × selected higher-degree terms. approximately 840,000 observations, which 200,000 are ranges taken nine equipped retroreflectors. 22 terms out degree order 30 amounting total 592 coefficients. Comparisons indicate substantial over solutions; even closer agreement previously published 6 contained gravity. In particular, free air calculated Rapp (1977) excellent high-degree (13 ≤ l 22). From these an estimate made upper mantle. mass constant earth, GM, estimated as 398,600.64±0.02 km3/s2, value principally determined Lageos. speed light 299,792.5 km/s. Geocentric positions were 150 stations These coordinates, their mean sea level heights, altimetry provide radius earth ae = 6,378,139 ± m. Accuracy estimates potential coefficients verified independent sets. produce commission geoid heights 1.9 1.5 (global rms values), respectively,

参考文章(11)
William M. Kaula, Theory of satellite geodesy ,(1966)
C. F. Martin, M. L. Butler, Calibration results for the GEOS-3 altimeter NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. ,vol. 77, pp. 33261- ,(1977)
J. A. Richardson, J. E. Brownd, C. A. Wagner, F. J. Lerch, Goddard Earth Models 5 and 6 NASA Special Publication. ,vol. 361, pp. 238- ,(1974)
D.G. King-Hele, Doreen M.C. Walker, R.H. Gooding, Evaluation of harmonics in the geopotential of order 15 and odd degree Planetary and Space Science. ,vol. 22, pp. 1349- 1373 ,(1974) , 10.1016/0032-0633(74)90035-X
Reiner Rummel, Richard H. Rapp, The influence of the atmosphere on geoid and potential coefficient determinations from gravity data Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 81, pp. 5639- 5642 ,(1976) , 10.1029/JB081I032P05639
Helmut Moritz, Advanced Least-Squares Methods, ,(1972)
William M. Chapple, Terry E. Tullis, Evaluation of the forces that drive the plates Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 82, pp. 1967- 1984 ,(1977) , 10.1029/JB082I014P01967
M. A. Khan, Earth's isostatic gravity anomaly field. Earth's isostatic gravity anomaly field. ,(1973)