A quantitative study on the effectiveness of peer review for academic journals
作者： Zheng Ma , Yuntao Pan , Zhenglu Yu , Jingting Wang , Jia Jia
DOI: 10.1007/S11192-012-0879-2
关键词:
摘要: Peer review is a classic method in the field of quality analysis, but effectiveness peer reviewing has never been researched using quantity analysis indicators. A new indicator for academic journals, Effectiveness Review (EPR), defined evaluating reviewing. If assumption valid, EPR could be simple such effectiveness. In sample experiment, 28 journals were tested, and was able to reflect accurately impact those journals.
springer.com
acm.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(29)
Margaret Eisenhart, The Paradox of Peer Review: Admitting too Much or Allowing too Little? Research in Science Education. ,vol. 32, pp. 241- 255 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1016082229411
Mohammadreza Hojat, Joseph S. Gonnella, Addeane S. Caelleigh, Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education. ,vol. 8, pp. 75- 96 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1022670432373
Tom Jefferson, Melanie Rudin, Suzanne Brodney Folse, Frank Davidoff, Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(2007) , 10.1002/14651858.MR000016.PUB3
W H. Glaze, Editorial: Peer review: A foundation of science. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 22, pp. 235- 235 ,(1988) , 10.1021/ES00168A602
Yataro Yoshida, Peer review system: any other choice? International Journal of Hematology. ,vol. 83, pp. 191- 192 ,(2006) , 10.1532/IJH97.06031
Wolfgang Glänzel, Balázs Schlemmer, Bart Thijs, Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon Scientometrics. ,vol. 58, pp. 571- 586 ,(2003) , 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006881.30700.EA
Fiona Godlee, Catharine R. Gale, Christopher N. Martyn, Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. ,vol. 280, pp. 237- 240 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.280.3.237
Vincent Larivière, Yves Gingras, Éric Archambault, The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 60, pp. 858- 862 ,(2009) , 10.1002/ASI.V60:4
Stephen Lock, Does Editorial Peer Review Work? Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 121, pp. 60- 61 ,(1994) , 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00012
Tom Jefferson, Elizabeth Wager, Frank Davidoff, Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA. ,vol. 287, pp. 2786- 2790 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.287.21.2786