Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation.

作者: Sarah Parkinson

DOI: 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2009.03.003

关键词:

摘要: This paper examines the assumptions that commonly underpin design of participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) within development programmes through examination a case study large rural programme in Uganda. reveals mismatch between participant perceptions, which stymied implementation PM&E. In this case, PM&E was based on goals were compatible, participants willing to volunteer engage themselves for greater good their communities, information sharing communication fairly free open. However, farmers felt bureaucratic accountability requirements not concern, acutely aware power differences officials, varying status. The key lesson be drawn from is need heightened awareness dynamics political factors

参考文章(19)
Jutta Blauert, Roger Ricafort, Marisol Estrella, Julian Gonsalves, Dindo Campilan, Deb Johnson, John Gaventa, Irene Guijt, Learning from Change ,(2000)
John Farrington, Development as Process Routledge. ,(1998) , 10.4324/9780203982754
Uma Kothari, Bill Cooke, Participation: the New Tyranny? Participation: the new tyranny?. ,(2001)
U. Kothari, B. Cooke, F. Cleaver, Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. Participation: the new tyranny?. pp. 36- 55 ,(2001)
Norman Uphoff, A Field Methodology for Participatory Self-Evaluation Community Development Journal. ,vol. 26, pp. 271- 285 ,(1991) , 10.1093/CDJ/26.4.271
Michael Bamberger, The politics of evaluation in developing countries Evaluation and Program Planning. ,vol. 14, pp. 325- 339 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0149-7189(91)90015-9
Merydth Holte-McKenzie, Sarah Forde, Sally Theobald, Development of a participatory monitoring and evaluation strategy Evaluation and Program Planning. ,vol. 29, pp. 365- 376 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2006.08.007