作者: N. S. I. Gordon , G. Hadlow , E. Knight , P. Mohan
DOI: 10.1111/J.1445-2197.1997.TB01991.X
关键词:
摘要: Background: In recent times there has been a number of newer methods advocated as treatment for bladder outlet obstruction. Prior to embracing these technologies, the authors' experiences with conventional transurethral resection prostate should be evaluated and compared those experienced in modalities. The objective was determine whether standard (TURP) still favourably modalities terms duration stay, catheterization, re-admission rate, re-catheterization cost long-term results. results are workers whose level expertise best that could achieved needle ablation (TUNA) laser prostatectomy. Methods: During 3-year period from September 1992 1995, 575 TURP were carried out regional hospital. total postoperative rates assessed costs estimated. Results: Transurethral shown compare hospital admission have significantly lower rate than modalities. Conclusion: is method choice surgical management obstruction, it remains gold standard. Having reviewed by experts fields, found compares procedures. From point view catherization, well results, not believed advantageous at this stage.