Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale.

作者: Xixi Wang , Shiyou Shang , Zhongyi Qu , Tingxi Liu , Assefa M. Melesse

DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2010.02.023

关键词:

摘要: Wetlands are one of the most important watershed microtopographic features that affect hydrologic processes (e.g., routing) and fate transport constituents sediment nutrients). Efforts to conserve existing wetlands and/or restore lost require watershed-level effects on water quantity quality be quantified. Because monitoring approaches usually cost or logistics prohibitive at scale, distributed models such as Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), enhanced by equivalent wetland (HEW) concept developed Wang [Wang, X., Yang, W., Melesse, A.M., 2008. Using within SWAT estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. Trans. ASABE 51 (1), 55–72.], can a best resort. However, there is serious lack information about simulated using this kind integrated modeling approach. The objective study was use HEW assess restoration Broughton's Creek located southwestern Manitoba, conservation upper portion Otter Tail River northwestern Minnesota. results indicated allows nonlinear functional relations between characteristics size morphology) accurately represented models. loss first 10–20% Minnesota area would drastically increase peak discharge loadings sediment, total phosphorus (TP), nitrogen (TN). On other hand, justifiable reductions TP, TN Manitoba may 50–80% restored. Further, comparison predicted revealed seems deserve higher priority while both equally important.

参考文章(57)
Berit Arheimer, Hans B Wittgren, Modelling nitrogen removal in potential wetlands at the catchment scale Ecological Engineering. ,vol. 19, pp. 63- 80 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0925-8574(02)00034-4
Xixi Wang, Assefa M. Melesse, EFFECTS OF STATSGO AND SSURGO AS INPUTS ON SWAT MODEL'S SNOWMELT SIMULATION1 Journal of The American Water Resources Association. ,vol. 42, pp. 1217- 1236 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1752-1688.2006.TB05296.X
J. G. Arnold, N. Fohrer, SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 19, pp. 563- 572 ,(2005) , 10.1002/HYP.5611
M. W. Van Liew, J. G. Arnold, D. D. Bosch, PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL OF AUTOCALIBRATING A HYDROLOGIC MODEL Transactions of the ASABE. ,vol. 48, pp. 1025- 1040 ,(2005) , 10.13031/2013.18514
R. Srinivasan, T. S. Ramanarayanan, J. G. Arnold, S. T. Bednarz, LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION Journal of The American Water Resources Association. ,vol. 34, pp. 91- 101 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1752-1688.1998.TB05962.X
Mauro Di Luzio, Raghavan Srinivasan, Jeffrey G Arnold, A GIS-Coupled Hydrological Model System for the Watershed Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint and Point Sources of Pollution Transactions in Gis. ,vol. 8, pp. 113- 136 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1467-9671.2004.00170.X
Masaki Hayashi, William L. Quinton, Alain Pietroniro, John J. Gibson, Hydrologic functions of wetlands in a discontinuous permafrost basin indicated by isotopic and chemical signatures Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 296, pp. 81- 97 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2004.03.020
C.M. Finlayson, The challenge of integrating wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. ,vol. 13, pp. 281- 286 ,(2003) , 10.1002/AQC.598
Yuri G Motovilov, Lars Gottschalk, Kolbjørn Engeland, Allan Rodhe, Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. ,vol. 98, pp. 257- 277 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00102-1
G. H. Leavesley, S. L. Markstrom, P. J. Restrepo, R. J. Viger, A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 16, pp. 173- 187 ,(2002) , 10.1002/HYP.344