UNDERSTANDING GOVERNMENT: FOUR INTELLECTUAL TRADITIONS IN THE STUDY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9299.2008.00742.X
关键词:
摘要: In this article a conceptual map of the identity study public administration is developed that encompasses its theoretical diversity and richness. It organizes scholarship into four main intellectual traditions: practical wisdom, experience, scientific knowledge relativist perspectives. The objective to outline study’s fundamental heterodoxy interdisciplinarity. While clearly has strong national components everywhere, traditions go across beyond government study.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(85)
David John Farmer, To Kill the King: Post-Traditional Governance and Bureaucracy ,(2005)
Camilla Stivers, Bureau Men, Settlement Women: Constructing Public Administration in the Progressive Era ,(2000)
Erik-Hans Klijn, Johannes Franciscus Maria Koppenjan, Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making Routledge. ,(2004)
H. George Frederickson, New Public Administration ,(1980)
Henry Hardy, Berlin, Isaiah, Sir, The Roots of Romanticism ,(1999)
Joe Doherty, Elspeth Graham, Mark Malek, None, Postmodernism and the Social Sciences ,(1992)
Elinor Ostrom, Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems ,(1992)
Richard Joseph Stillman, Public administration: Concepts and cases ,(1976)
Michael W. Spicer, Public Administration and the State: A Postmodern Perspective The University of Alabama Press. ,(2005)
Kenneth J. Meier, Public Administration and The Myth of Positivism: The Antichrist'S View Administrative Theory & Praxis. ,vol. 27, pp. 650- 668 ,(2005) , 10.1080/10841806.2005.11029511