A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: Impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses

作者: James P Crane , Michael L LeFevre , Renee C Winborn , Joni K Evans , Bernard G Ewigman

DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70040-0

关键词:

摘要: Objective: The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to test the hypothesis that ultrasonographic screening would significantly alter perinatal outcome as a result antenatal detection fetal congenital malformations. Study Design: Pregnant women without specific indication for ultrasonography were randomly assigned have either two sonograms (15 22 weeks and 31 35 weeks) or conventional obstetric care with used only determined by judgment patient's physician. frequency birth defect in screened control populations compared, impact discovery on pregnancy outcome. Results: Major malformations occurred 2.3% 15,281 fetuses infants study. Antenatal detected 35% anomalous group versus 11 % population (relative rate 3.1; 95% confidence interval 2.0 5.1). Ultrasonography did not, however, influence management pregnancies complicated Specifically, 9 abortions performed anomalies among 7685 whereas 4 terminated 7596 subjects. also had no significant survival rates potentially treatable, life-threatening despite opportunity take precautionary measures such delivery tertiary center. Conclusions: low-risk pregnant abortion anomalies. Survival unaffected screening.

参考文章(18)
Philip M. Marden, David W. Smith, Michael J. McDonald, Congenital anomalies in the newborninfant, including minor variations The Journal of Pediatrics. ,vol. 64, pp. 357- 371 ,(1964) , 10.1016/S0022-3476(64)80188-8
John P. McGahan, Controversies in ultrasound Churchill Livingstone. ,(1987)
Harold Kalter, Josef Warkany, Medical progress. Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention (first of two parts). The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 308, pp. 424- 431 ,(1983) , 10.1056/NEJM198302243080804
Marden P. M., Smith D. W., McDonald M. J., Congenital anomalies in the newborn infant, including minor variations Nursing Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 361- ,(1964) , 10.1097/00006199-196413040-00060
S. Levi, Y. Hyjazi, J.-P. Schaapst, P. Defoort, R. Coulon, P. Buekens, Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: The Belgian Multicentric Study Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 1, pp. 102- 110 ,(1991) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1991.01020102.X
Isabel M. Shirley, Fiona Bottomley, Victor P. Robinson, Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population. British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 65, pp. 564- 569 ,(1992) , 10.1259/0007-1285-65-775-564
Lars Grennert, Per-Håkan Persson, Gerhard Gennser, Stig Kullander, Benefits of Ultrasonic Screening of a Pregnant Population Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 57, pp. 5- 14 ,(1978) , 10.3109/00016347809162696
C. Stoll, Y. Alembik, B. Dott, P. M. Roth, B. De Geeter, Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 13, pp. 453- 461 ,(1998) , 10.1002/PD.1970130606
A. Saari-Kemppainen, O. Karjalainen, P. Ylostalo, O.P. Heinonen, Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy The Lancet. ,vol. 336, pp. 387- 391 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91941-3