Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models

作者: Hannes Matuschek , Reinhold Kliegl , Shravan Vasishth , Harald Baayen , Douglas Bates

DOI: 10.1016/J.JML.2017.01.001

关键词:

摘要: Linear mixed-effects models have increasingly replaced mixed-model analyses of variance for statistical inference in factorial psycholinguistic experiments. Although LMMs many advantages over ANOVA, like ANOVAs, setting them up data analysis also requires some care. One simple option, when numerically possible, is to fit the full variance-covariance structure random effects (the maximal model; Barr et al. 2013), presumably keep Type I error down nominal alpha presence effects. it true that fitting a model with only intercepts may lead higher error, has cost: can significant loss power. We demonstrate this simulations and suggest typical psychological data, power achieved without inflating rate if selection criterion used select effect supported by data.

参考文章(22)
Joachim Vandekerckhove, Dora Matzke, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Model Comparison and the Principle of Parsimony Oxford Handbooks Online. ,(2015) , 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199957996.013.14
Lena A. Jäger, Felix Engelmann, Shravan Vasishth, Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling Frontiers in Psychology. ,vol. 6, pp. 617- 617 ,(2015) , 10.3389/FPSYG.2015.00617
Shravan Vasishth, Harald Baayen, Reinhold Kliegl, Douglas Bates, Parsimonious Mixed Models arXiv: Methodology. ,(2015)
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 67, pp. 1- 48 ,(2015) , 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
Shravan Vasishth, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, Gueilan Guo, Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage PLoS ONE. ,vol. 8, pp. e77006- ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0077006
Hirotogu Akaike, Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle international symposium on information theory. ,vol. 1, pp. 610- 624 ,(1973) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
Andrew Gelman, John Carlin, Beyond Power Calculations Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors Perspectives on Psychological Science. ,vol. 9, pp. 641- 651 ,(2014) , 10.1177/1745691614551642