Beyond Power Calculations Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors

作者: Andrew Gelman , John Carlin

DOI: 10.1177/1745691614551642

关键词:

摘要: Statistical power analysis provides the conventional approach to assess error rates when designing a research study. However, is flawed in that narrow emphasis on statistical significance placed as primary focus of study design. In noisy, small-sample settings, statistically significant results can often be misleading. To help researchers address this problem context their own studies, we recommend design calculations which (a) probability an estimate being wrong direction (Type S [sign] error) and (b) factor by magnitude effect might overestimated M [magnitude] or exaggeration ratio) are estimated. We illustrate with examples from recent published discuss largest challenge calculation: coming up reasonable estimates plausible sizes based external information.

参考文章(30)
Andrew Gelman, Letter to the Editors Regarding Some Papers of Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 245, pp. 597- 599 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JTBI.2006.11.005
David M. Lane, William P. Dunlap, Estimating effect size: Bias resulting from the significance criterion in editorial decisions British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. ,vol. 31, pp. 107- 112 ,(1978) , 10.1111/J.2044-8317.1978.TB00578.X
Linda Broer, Christina M. Lill, Maaike Schuur, Najaf Amin, Johannes T. Roehr, Lars Bertram, John P. A. Ioannidis, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Distinguishing true from false positives in genomic studies: p values European Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 28, pp. 131- 138 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S10654-012-9755-X
Jonathan AC Sterne, George Davey Smith, Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ. ,vol. 322, pp. 226- 231 ,(2001) , 10.1136/BMJ.322.7280.226
Peter A. Lachenbruch, Jacob Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 84, pp. 1096- 1097 ,(1989) , 10.2307/2290095
Andrew Gelman, P values and statistical practice. Epidemiology. ,vol. 24, pp. 69- 72 ,(2013) , 10.1097/EDE.0B013E31827886F7
John M Hoenig, Dennis M Heisey, The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis The American Statistician. ,vol. 55, pp. 19- 24 ,(2001) , 10.1198/000313001300339897