Patents and Proprietary Assays

作者: Roger D. Klein

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0727-4_10

关键词:

摘要: Gene patents have been highly controversial in clinical diagnostics. Proponents claim that these promote gene discovery and encourage the production of novel diagnostic tests. Opponents argue are unnecessary for discovery, they raise costs, decrease patient access, harm innovation field molecular pathology. In two recent Supreme Court cases, Mayo v. Prometheus Association Molecular Pathology Myriad Genetics, ruled biological correlations human DNA sequences represent natural laws cannot be patented. These cases appear to eliminated patent-based monopolization testing mutations genes genotype–phenotype relationships, will help facilitate introduction large-scale sequencing into practice. The has thereby encouraged advancement, development, implementation personalized medicine.

参考文章(14)
Roger D Klein, Gene patents and genetic testing in the United States. Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 25, pp. 989- 990 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NBT0907-989
Robert Cook-Deegan, John M Conley, James P Evans, Daniel Vorhaus, The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 21, pp. 585- 588 ,(2013) , 10.1038/EJHG.2012.217
Timothy Caulfield, Robert M Cook-Deegan, F Scott Kieff, John P Walsh, Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1091- 1094 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NBT0906-1091
Mildred K. Cho, Samantha Illangasekare, Meredith A. Weaver, Debra G.B. Leonard, Jon F. Merz, Effects of Patents and Licenses on the Provision of Clinical Genetic Testing Services The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. ,vol. 5, pp. 3- 8 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60444-8
Hamilton Moses, E. Ray Dorsey, David H. M. Matheson, Samuel O. Thier, Financial Anatomy of Biomedical Research JAMA. ,vol. 294, pp. 1333- 1342 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.294.11.1333