Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies

作者: Timothy Caulfield , Robert M Cook-Deegan , F Scott Kieff , John P Walsh

DOI: 10.1038/NBT0906-1091

关键词:

摘要: When it comes to gene patenting, policy makers may be responding more high-profile media controversies than systematic data about the issues.

参考文章(36)
Jon F. Merz, Antigone G. Kriss, Debra G. B. Leonard, Mildred K. Cho, Diagnostic testing fails the test Nature. ,vol. 415, pp. 577- 579 ,(2002) , 10.1038/415577A
Bryn Williams-Jones, History of a gene patent: tracing the development and application of commercial BRCA testing. Health law journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 123- 146 ,(2002)
Anne-Marie Mazza, Stephen A. Merrill, None, Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health National Academies Press (US). ,(2006)
R. S. Eisenberg, Patent Swords and Shields Science. ,vol. 299, pp. 1018- 1019 ,(2003) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1081790
Robert P. Merges, Richard R. Nelson, On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope Columbia Law Review. ,vol. 90, pp. 839- ,(1990) , 10.2307/1122920
John P Walsh, Ashish Arora, Wesley M Cohen, Working through the patent problem Science. ,vol. 299, pp. 1021- 1021 ,(2003) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.299.5609.1021
D. Grimm, MOUSE GENETICS: A Mouse for Every Gene Science. ,vol. 312, pp. 1862- 1866 ,(2006) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.312.5782.1862
Kyle Jensen, Fiona Murray, Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome Science. ,vol. 310, pp. 239- 240 ,(2005) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1120014