Training the urologic oncologist of the future: Where are the challenges?

作者: Maurizio Buscarini , John P. Stein

DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLONC.2008.07.026

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objective Training the new generation of urologic oncologist from a surgical perspective poses unique challenges. The advent minimally invasive procedures coupled with need to perform open has significantly increased demands upon both trainer and trainee. learning practice complex demand continuous improvements in training programs. This review discusses some theoretical practical issues be considered for successful safe transmission skills an era increasing regulations. Findings Few systematic studies address this topic, leaving ample margin research improvement endeavor. It is authors' opinion that mentorship remains most significant important component today. simulation, virtual reality, modular teaching represent (novel important) advances field education. While residency programs have incorporated these changes into their curriculum, not become widespread available literature at best sporadic. Conclusions Mentorship integral if critical Other novel approaches developed should traditional concepts training. may even more surgery. vast majority published concur model “see one, do teach one” optimal approach skills. Socioeconomic are forcing community rethink how they train residents absorb technologies. Adapting posed on educators represents great challenge upcoming years.

参考文章(37)
J. Maresceaux, L. Soler, R. Ceulemans, A. Garcia, M. Henri, E. Dutson, Bildfusion, virtuelle Realität, Robotik und Navigation Einfluss auf die chirurgische Praxis Der Chirurg. ,vol. 73, pp. 422- 427 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00104-002-0473-X
William A. Nolen, The making of a surgeon ,(1970)
K. Anders Ericsson, The Acquisition of Expert Performance: An Introduction to Some of the Issues Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 13- 62 ,(1996) , 10.4324/9781315805948-6
Richard Reznick, Glenn Regehr, Helen MacRae, Jenepher Martin, Wendy McCulloch, Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 173, pp. 226- 230 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89597-9
Colin B. Begg, Elyn R. Riedel, Peter B. Bach, Michael W. Kattan, Deborah Schrag, Joan L. Warren, Peter T. Scardino, Variations in Morbidity after Radical Prostatectomy The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 346, pp. 1138- 1144 ,(2002) , 10.1056/NEJMSA011788
G.R. Martina, P. Giumelli, S. Scuzzarella, M. Remotti, G. Caruso, J. Lovisolo, Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy—learning curve of a laparoscopy-naive urologist in a community hospital Urology. ,vol. 65, pp. 959- 963 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.11.019
Carlos A. Pellegrini, Surgical education in the United States: navigating the white waters. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 244, pp. 335- 342 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.SLA.0000234800.08200.6C
Tom Treasure, The learning curve BMJ. ,vol. 329, pp. 424.1- 424 ,(2004) , 10.1136/BMJ.38176.444745.63
A Palepu, R H Friedman, R C Barnett, P L Carr, A S Ash, L Szalacha, M A Moskowitz, Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 73, pp. 318- 323 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00001888-199803000-00021