Stuck in transition: Russian regional planning policy between spatial polarization and equalization

作者: Nadir Kinossian

DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2014.901176

关键词:

摘要: The preparation of a nationwide framework for Russian regional planning policy has been impeded by an ongoing conflict between two competing logics territorial organization: that “polarized” or “equalized” development. This paper analyzes the within context political authoritarianism and continuing neoliberal reforms. findings indicate (1) stalemate in policy, caused fundamental contradictions authoritarian centralization need to stimulate growth; (2) absence coherent government other actors employ ad hoc “unguided” approaches development projects; (3) main result is increasingly polarized pattern

参考文章(51)
R. D. Oldham, A New Geography The Geographical Journal. ,vol. 34, pp. 156- ,(1909) , 10.2307/1777819
Neil Brenner, New State Spaces Oxford University Press. ,(2004) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199270057.001.0001
Nancy E. Popson, Jodi Koehn, Blair A. Ruble, Fragmented space in the Russian Federation Woodrow Wilson Center Press , Johns Hopkins University Press. ,(2001)
William H. Gttnlocke, And george j ,(1923)
David Harvey, Spaces of Global Capitalism ,(2006)
Tomila V. Lankina, Regional Developments in Russia: Territorial Fragmentation in a Consolidating Authoritarian State Social research: An international quarterly of the social sciences. ,vol. 76, pp. 225- 256 ,(2009)
Robert M. Buckley, Federico Mini, From commissars to mayors : cities in the transition economies Infrastructure Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, World Bank. pp. 1- ,(2000) , 10.1596/0-8213-4805-1
MEGAN DIXON, Gazprom versus the Skyline: Spatial Displacement and Social Contention in St. Petersburg International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 35- 54 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1468-2427.2009.00871.X