Cause of high variability in drug dissolution testing and its impact on setting tolerances.

作者: Saeed A Qureshi , Javad Shabnam

DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(00)00174-3

关键词:

摘要: Considering a variable mixing/stirring and flow pattern in drug dissolution vessel as likely source of high variability results, experiments were conducted using USP paddle apparatus by placing (aligned to the walls) metal strip (1.7 mm thick×6.4 wide) vessel. The forces undisintegrated tablet settle about 3 away from centre, facilitates spread disintegrated material diminishes cone formation at bottom To assess impact this altered environment vessel, but still maintaining dimensions within required specifications, release characteristics evaluated for products having different formulation/manufacturing attributes. Tests with calibrator tablets (USP prednisone salicylic acid FDA proposed NCDA No. 2 tablets) two commercially available (250 mg amoxicillin capsules 5 glibenclamide tablets). Except product, all gave significantly (P<0.01) higher results vessels containing than without. extent increased varied product i.e. was smallest (14.4%) largest (88.4%). Based on obtained study, it is concluded that employing current apparatuses, many cases will provide lower anticipated which may not be reflective characteristics. Test-to-test variability, or between laboratories, can also very depending settling position once dropped and/or due slight aberration walls altering Thus, testing require wider tolerances useful comparison batch-to-batch interlaboratory results.

参考文章(11)
Timothy J. McCormick, Industry Perspective on Dissolution Apparatus Calibration Dissolution Technologies. ,vol. 2, pp. 12- 15 ,(1995) , 10.14227/DT020495P12
Saeed A Qureshi, Iain J McGilveray, Typical variability in drug dissolution testing: study with USP and FDA calibrator tablets and a marketed drug (glibenclamide) product European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 7, pp. 249- 258 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0928-0987(98)00034-7
Don C. Cox, Clyde E. Wells, William B. Furman, Thomas S. Savage, Alfred C. King, Systematic Error Associated with Apparatus 2 of the USP Dissolution Test II: Effects of Deviations in Vessel Curvature from That of a Sphere Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 71, pp. 395- 399 ,(1982) , 10.1002/JPS.2600710405
A. S. Achanta, V. A. Gray, T. L. Cecil, L. T. Grady, Evaluation of the Performance of Prednisone and Salicylic Acid Usp Dissolution Calibrators Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. ,vol. 21, pp. 1171- 1182 ,(1995) , 10.3109/03639049509026666
S. A. Qureshi, I. J. McGilveray, Assessment of Pharmaceutical Quality of Furosemide Tablets from Multinational Markets Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. ,vol. 24, pp. 995- 1005 ,(1998) , 10.3109/03639049809089943
H. Blume, S. L. Ali, M. Siewert, Pharmaceutical Quality of Glibenclamide Products A Multinational Postmarket Comparative Study Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. ,vol. 19, pp. 2713- 2741 ,(1993) , 10.3109/03639049309050174
Don C. Cox, William B. Furman, Donald P. Page, Systematic Error Associated with Apparatus 2 of the USP Dissolution Test IV: Effect of Air Dissolved in the Dissolution Medium Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 72, pp. 1061- 1064 ,(1983) , 10.1002/JPS.2600720923
Arnold H. Beckett, Tinh T. Quach, Glenn S. Kurs, Improved Hydrodynamics for USP Apparatus 2 Dissolution Technologies. ,vol. 3, pp. 7- 18 ,(1996) , 10.14227/DT030296P7
S. A. Qureshi, I. J. McGilveray, A Critical Assessment of the Usp Dissolution Apparatus Suitability Test Criteria Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. ,vol. 21, pp. 905- 924 ,(1995) , 10.3109/03639049509026656