作者: Pablo Silveira dos Santos , Djessica Pedrotti , Mariana Minatel Braga , Rachel de Oliveira Rocha , Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107/2017.VOL31.0101
关键词:
摘要: This study aimed to systematically review the literature address question regarding influence of different materials in clinical and radiographic success indirect pulp treatment primary teeth. A search was carried out for articles published prior January 2017 PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Scopus, TRIP ClinicalTrials databases; relevant included randomized trials that compared used Two reviewers independently selected studies extracted data. The effects each material on outcome (clinical failures) were analyzed using a mixed comparisons meta-analysis. ranking treatments according their probability being best choice also calculated. From 1,088 potentially eligible studies, 11 full-text analysis, 4 In all papers, calcium hydroxide liner as control group versus an adhesive system, resin-modified glass ionomer cement or placebo. follow-up period ranged from 24 48 months, with dropout rates 0-25.7%. type did not significantly affect risk failure treatment. However, presented higher failure. conclusion, there is no scientific evidence showing superiority any