Materials used for indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis

作者: Pablo Silveira dos Santos , Djessica Pedrotti , Mariana Minatel Braga , Rachel de Oliveira Rocha , Tathiane Larissa Lenzi

DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107/2017.VOL31.0101

关键词:

摘要: This study aimed to systematically review the literature address question regarding influence of different materials in clinical and radiographic success indirect pulp treatment primary teeth. A search was carried out for articles published prior January 2017 PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Scopus, TRIP ClinicalTrials databases; relevant included randomized trials that compared used Two reviewers independently selected studies extracted data. The effects each material on outcome (clinical failures) were analyzed using a mixed comparisons meta-analysis. ranking treatments according their probability being best choice also calculated. From 1,088 potentially eligible studies, 11 full-text analysis, 4 In all papers, calcium hydroxide liner as control group versus an adhesive system, resin-modified glass ionomer cement or placebo. follow-up period ranged from 24 48 months, with dropout rates 0-25.7%. type did not significantly affect risk failure treatment. However, presented higher failure. conclusion, there is no scientific evidence showing superiority any

参考文章(24)
Renata Franzon, Sandra Henz, Marisa Maltz, Marcia Cançado Figueiredo, Fernando Borba De Araújo, Alice Souza Pinto, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Clinical and microbiological effect of calcium hydroxide protection in indirect pulp capping in primary teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. ,vol. 19, pp. 382- 386 ,(2006)
Lloyd H Straffon, Jacques E Nör, Fernando B Araujo, Caline A Falster, Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatric Dentistry. ,vol. 24, pp. 241- 248 ,(2002)
Van Thompson Thompson, Ronald G. Craig, Fredrick A. Curro, William S. Green, Jonathan A. Ship, Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal The Journal of the American Dental Association. ,vol. 139, pp. 705- 712 ,(2008) , 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.2008.0252
Lloyd H Straffon, Robert J Feigal, Kathleen B Welch, Mohammed A Al-Zayer, Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatric Dentistry. ,vol. 25, pp. 29- 36 ,(2003)
Dalila Boulkhemair, Ben Schöttker, Dagmar Lühmann, Heiner Raspe, Indirect comparisons of therapeutic interventions. GMS health technology assessment. ,vol. 5, ,(2009) , 10.3205/HTA000071
Alessandra Reis, Alessandro Dourado Loguercio, Marcos Schroeder, Issis Luque-Martinez, Danielle Masterson, Lucianne Cople Maia, Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis Dental Materials. ,vol. 31, pp. 1052- 1067 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2015.06.001
Marina Agathi Petrou, Fadi Alhaddad Alhamoui, Alexander Welk, Mohammed Basel Altarabulsi, Mohammed Alkilzy, Christian H. Splieth, A randomized clinical trial on the use of medical Portland cement, MTA and calcium hydroxide in indirect pulp treatment. Clinical Oral Investigations. ,vol. 18, pp. 1383- 1389 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00784-013-1107-Z
Luciano Casagrande, Letícia Westphalen Bento, Simone Ossok Rerin, Èvelin de Resende Lucas, Débora Martini Dalpian, Fernando Borba de Araujo, In vivo outcomes of indirect pulp treatment using a self-etching primer versus calcium hydroxide over the demineralized dentin in primary molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. ,vol. 33, pp. 131- 136 ,(2008) , 10.17796/JCPD.33.2.82R1TP71X75M5345
David J Spiegelhalter, Nicola G Best, Bradley P Carlin, Angelika Van Der Linde, None, Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit Journal of The Royal Statistical Society Series B-statistical Methodology. ,vol. 64, pp. 583- 639 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
E. F. Oliveira, G. Carminatti, V. Fontanella, M. Maltz, The monitoring of deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: results after 14-18 months. Clinical Oral Investigations. ,vol. 10, pp. 134- 139 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00784-006-0033-8