作者: Pooya Banapour , Peter Elliott , Ramzi Jabaji , Ashish Parekh , Apurba Pathak
DOI: 10.1007/S11701-018-0848-8
关键词:
摘要: Since its inception, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has developed into a familiar surgical modality with improved perioperative outcomes including decreased hospital stay for localized prostate cancer patients. Experience outpatient RARP been reported as early 2010. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of by comparing between patients undergoing to discharged on day following surgery. This is single-institution retrospective cohort study. Patients disease who underwent without pelvic lymph node dissection from September 2017 January 2018 were included. T tests Chi-squared analysis used compare demographic characteristics same surgery (outpatient RARP) after (inpatient RARP). Of 51 included in 26 while 25 inpatient RARP. There was no significant difference mean age (61.4 vs 65.8 years, p = 0.05), BMI (27.1 28.3 kg/m2, p = 0.35), ethnicity, tobacco use (8 15%, p = 0.41), PSA (8.7 8.4 ng/dL, p = 0.77), biopsy Gleason score distribution, size (51.8 57.7 cc, p = 0.26) or preoperative hemoglobin (14.3 13.4 g/dL, p = 0.06), respectively. operative time (95.3 101 min, p = 0.16), EBL (52.8 66.5 cc, p = 0.08), postoperative change (− 1 − 1.1 g/dL, p = 0.62), pathologic stage distribution complication rate (4 8%, p = 0.58) RARP, Outpatient offers similar when compared We advocate safe feasible alternative appropriately selected Furthermore, introduce an model that can be applied other institutions seeking implement