Process Intensification: Safety Pros and Cons

作者: J.C. Etchells

DOI: 10.1205/PSEP.04241

关键词:

摘要: One of the best ways preventing accidents is to avoid hazards by inherently safer design. The adoption such principles now required EU legislation. As many processes, particularly those in chemicals, nuclear and oil industries, involve production, handling use hazardous substances, process intensification (PI) one way which inventory consequences a failure, may be significantly reduced. PI, therefore, has potential significant factor implementation inherent safety. However, conflict can arise between PI some safety practices. For example, certain technologies require higher energy inputs or operated at temperatures. processes more complex call for control system. this reason, both (including chemistry, where appropriate) plant need considered together reach comprehensive understanding issues. This paper gives examples how has, might have, improved Some issues that are also discussed. In order promote benefits intensification, draw attention considerations, HSE co-sponsoring network (PIN) liaison with industry Department Trade Industry.

参考文章(5)
Dennis C. Hendershot, Conflicts and decisions in the search for inherently safer process options Process Safety Progress. ,vol. 14, pp. 52- 56 ,(1995) , 10.1002/PRS.680140109
Paul Wentworth, Getting the chemistry right Nature Biotechnology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1017- 1018 ,(1997) , 10.1038/NBT1097-1017B
J. C. Etchells, Why Reactions Run Away† Organic Process Research & Development. ,vol. 1, pp. 435- 437 ,(1997) , 10.1021/OP970031N
Corwin D. Edwards, Delivered Prices: Doing Business under the Present Law Michigan Law Review. ,vol. 47, pp. 743- ,(1949) , 10.2307/1284266