Who's the Best? A Relativistic View of Expertise

作者: David J. Weiss , James Shanteau

DOI: 10.1002/ACP.3015

关键词:

摘要: Summary The dictionary and the expert performance approach view an as one who, after sufficient training experience in a domain, can perform requisite tasks above threshold level. In contrast, we argue for performance-based that implies expertise is continuum; experts are best performers. Most which be demonstrated have underlying core of judgment, including domains call judgment to overlain with performance, prediction, or instruction. To evaluate employ metaphor judge measuring instrument. Like instrument, according has three key properties: discrimination, consistency, validity. Validity requires ground truth usually difficult establish; but other two properties readily observable, they combined Cochran–Weiss–Shanteau index. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(71)
Kenneth R. Hammond, Human judgment and social policy ,(1980)
Dan Bernstein, Randy Bass, The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Academe. ,vol. 91, pp. 37- 43 ,(2005) , 10.2307/40253429
Thomas Mann, The Black Swan ,(1954)
Robert W. Weisberg, Modes of Expertise in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies Cambridge University Press. pp. 761- 788 ,(2006) , 10.1017/CBO9780511816796.042
Maynard M, Bilkey A, Hyre K, Predicting job performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. ,vol. 26, pp. 265- 268 ,(1972)
Leonard Mlodinow, The Drunkard's walk : how randomness rules our lives Pantheon Books. ,(2009)
Barbara Carol Cole, The East Germany sports system: image and reality Texas Tech University. ,(2000)
William H. Batchelder, Alex Strashny, A. Kimball Romney, Cultural consensus theory: aggregating continuous responses in a finite interval social computing behavioral modeling and prediction. ,vol. 6007, pp. 98- 107 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-3-642-12079-4_15