Efficient application of a browsing repellent: Can associational effects within and between plants be exploited?

作者: Rebecca S. Stutz , Simen Pedersen , Malin Teräväinen , Petter Kjellander , Olof Leimar

DOI: 10.1007/S10342-019-01166-6

关键词:

摘要: Browsing can reduce forest productivity, particularly when the apical shoots of trees are damaged. Repellents used widely to browsing, but application is costly. To improve efficiency, it may be possible take advantage associational plant refuge effects, requiring repellents applied only some or parts trees, reapplied less frequently. Using captive moose (Alces alces) and constructed stands Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), we tested for potential refuges by applying a commercial repellent (HaTe2) all, alternate none shoots, all previous-year shoots. We also under field conditions, in stands. Captive (two individuals 2.1-ha enclosure, ~ 95 km−2) browsed 100% were significantly likely browse treated with repellent. Associational was ineffective both within between trees. In (0.84 km−2), 1.3% sustained browsing damage. Applying pines had no direct effect nor any within-plant effects. Trees provided protection untreated neighbouring this not biologically meaningful given low percentage overall. Here, simple experiment predictive response observed field, demonstrating need test strategies situ.

参考文章(45)
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 67, pp. 1- 48 ,(2015) , 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
Michael Conover, Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 25, pp. 298- 305 ,(1997)
Ivar Herfindal, Jean-Pierre Tremblay, Alison J. Hester, Unni Støbet Lande, Hilde Karine Wam, Associational relationships at multiple spatial scales affect forest damage by moose Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 348, pp. 97- 107 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.03.045
Simen PEDERSEN, Erlend B. NILSEN, Harry P. ANDREASSEN, Moose winter browsing affects the breeding success of great tits Ecoscience. ,vol. 14, pp. 499- 506 ,(2007) , 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[499:MWBATB]2.0.CO;2
Lisa A. Shipley, John E. Gross, Donald E. Spalinger, N. Thompson Hobbs, Bruce A. Wunder, The Scaling of Intake Rate in Mammalian Herbivores The American Naturalist. ,vol. 143, pp. 1055- 1082 ,(1994) , 10.1086/285648
Stephen C. F. Palmer, Alison J. Hester, David A. Elston, Iain J. Gordon, Sue E. Hartley, THE PERILS OF HAVING TASTY NEIGHBORS: GRAZING IMPACTS OF LARGE HERBIVORES AT VEGETATION BOUNDARIES Ecology. ,vol. 84, pp. 2877- 2890 ,(2003) , 10.1890/02-0245
William F. Andelt, Dan L. Baker, Kenneth P. Burnham, RELATIVE PREFERENCE OF CAPTIVE COW ELK FOR REPELLENT-TREATED DIETS Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 56, pp. 164- 173 ,(1992) , 10.2307/3808805
Ylva Kullberg, Roger Bergström, Winter Browsing by Large Herbivores on Planted Deciduous Seedlings in Southern Sweden Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 371- 378 ,(2001) , 10.1080/02827580117385
F. Santilli, L. Mori, L. Galardi, Evaluation of three repellents for the prevention of damage to olive seedlings by deer European Journal of Wildlife Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 85- 89 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S10344-004-0036-1