Integrated Comparison of GWAS, Transcriptome, and Proteomics Studies Highlights Similarities in the Biological Basis of Animal and Human Myopia.

作者: Nina Riddell , Sheila G. Crewther

DOI: 10.1167/IOVS.16-20618

关键词:

摘要: Purpose To identify commonalities between the genes in close proximity to genome-wide association study (GWAS) refractive error and axial length loci, proteins differentially expressed animal models of optically induced error. Methods The GWAS catalog was searched for loci significantly (P ≤ 5*10-8) associated with or length. PubMed exploratory transcriptome proteomics studies A total 15 GWAS, 7 transcriptome, 9 met inclusion criteria. Ensembl's BioMart used human orthologs from studies. These were then compared protein-coding within 1 megabase (Mb), 500 kilobases (kb), 250 kb by using GeneOverlap R package, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P values odds ratios (ORs) calculated each intersection. Results near overlapped downregulated during early myopia induction animals (1Mb: OR = 1.56, 0.025; kb: 1.92, 0.010; 2.33, 0.010). There also significant overlap late (OR 4.12, 0.018). When results segregated methodologic parameters, candidate at 1.50, 0.010) but not 1.04, 0.684) time-points. Gene protein expression responses appeared well conserved across model species, there no evidence greater GWAS-transcriptome concordance similar species humans (e.g., primates mammals). Conclusions findings suggest that genetic environmental factors control ocular growth via biological pathways support continued use investigating mechanisms underlying development.

参考文章(78)
Xiangtian Zhou, Jia Qu, Yan Bai, Liqin Jiang, Juxiu Ye, Jianzhen Shi, Ruozhong Xie, Runxia Lu, Mark D P Willcox, Changes in protein profiles of guinea pig sclera during development of form deprivation myopia and recovery. Molecular Vision. ,vol. 16, pp. 2163- 2174 ,(2010)
Ian G. Morgan, Kathryn A. Rose, Regan S. Ashby, Animal Models of Experimental Myopia: Limitations and Synergies with Studies on Human Myopia Springer, New York, NY. pp. 39- 58 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-8338-0_4
Robert Wojciechowski, Stephanie S. Yee, Claire L. Simpson, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Dwight Stambolian, Matrix metalloproteinases and educational attainment in refractive error: Evidence of gene-environment interactions in the age-related eye disease study Ophthalmology. ,vol. 120, pp. 298- 305 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2012.07.078
Mohamed Dirani, Ching-Yu Cheng, Seang-Mei Saw, Chen Wei Pan, Tien Y Wong, Is myopia more common in Asians? A systematic review and meta-analysis Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 55, pp. 3632- 3632 ,(2014)
D Stambolian, Genetic susceptibility and mechanisms for refractive error. Clinical Genetics. ,vol. 84, pp. 102- 108 ,(2013) , 10.1111/CGE.12180
Marita Pauline Feldkaemper, Frank Schaeffel, Christine Brand, A microarray analysis of retinal transcripts that are controlled by image contrast in mice Molecular Vision. ,vol. 13, pp. 920- 932 ,(2007)
Daniel Marzani, Josh Wallman, Chea-su Kee, Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 42, pp. 575- 583 ,(2001)
Allan F. Wiechmann, Jody A. Summers Rada, Ocular expression of avian thymic hormone: changes during the recovery from induced myopia. Molecular Vision. ,vol. 15, pp. 778- 792 ,(2009)
Marita Pauline Feldkaemper, Ruth Schippert, Frank Schaeffel, Microarray analysis of retinal gene expression in chicks during imposed myopic defocus. Molecular Vision. ,vol. 14, pp. 1589- 1599 ,(2008)
Andrei V Tkatchenko, Tatiana V Tkatchenko, Jeremy A Guggenheim, Virginie JM Verhoeven, Pirro G Hysi, Robert Wojciechowski, Pawan Kumar Singh, Ashok Kumar, Gopal Thinakaran, Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM), Cathy Williams, None, APLP2 Regulates Refractive Error and Myopia Development in Mice and Humans PLOS Genetics. ,vol. 11, pp. e1005432- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1005432