Getting the Measure of Measurement: Global Educational Opportunity.

作者: Penny Enslin , Mary Tjiattas

DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1048667

关键词:

摘要: Although measurement is widely misused in education, it indispensable addressing the problems of injustice global educational opportunity. Considering how case can be made for legitimate use normative analysis and argument, we explore ways which metrics have featured formulation theories justice, with particular attention to resourcist capabilities approaches. We then consider three means inequality defend a reconstruction public sphere objective measures deliberatively constructed, could supersede prevalent assumptions about measurement.

参考文章(32)
Debra Gourlay, Equality and Human Rights Commission The Scottish Parliament. ,(2013)
Amartya Sen, Justice: Means versus freedoms Philosophy & Public Affairs. ,vol. 19, ,(1990)
John Rawls, Social unity and primary goods Utilitarianism and Beyond. pp. 159- 186 ,(1982) , 10.1017/CBO9780511611964.010
Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge, Politics as Usual: What Lies behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric Polity Press. ,(2010)
Harry Brighouse, Ingrid Robeyns, Measuring Justice: List of contributors ,(2010) , 10.1017/CBO9780511810916
Erin Kelly, Equal opportunity, unequal capability Measuring Justice. pp. 61- 80 ,(2010) , 10.1017/CBO9780511810916.003
Martha Nussbaum, Iris Marion Young, Responsibility for Justice ,(2011)