A Reply to Groves

作者: Daniele Ruggiu

DOI: 10.1007/S11569-016-0254-5

关键词:

摘要: In this article, I respond to the criticisms of my ideas made by Christopher Groves in his piece “Logic Choice or Logic Care? Uncertainty, Technological Mediation and Responsible Innovation”, which was published journal. refutation objections, firstly argue that, thanks work European Court Human Rights, human rights are continuously evolving Europe therefore constitute a framework that is open future. Secondly, through codes conduct, guidelines, etc., give rise moral practices, for example business sphere, they not abstract universal like natural rights, but contextual actuated at world-regional level, particular. Finally, show more effective than an ethics care when it comes dealing with certain aspects intergenerational relationships, such as genetic enhancement humans.

参考文章(16)
Antonio Cassese, I diritti umani nel mondo contemporaneo Laterza. ,(1988)
Steven C Greer, The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion Under the European Convention on Human Rights Human rights files No 17. Council of Europe Publishing. ,(2000)
René von Schomberg, A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation Social Science Research Network. pp. 51- 74 ,(2013) , 10.1002/9781118551424.CH3
Joseph Raz, Human Rights Without Foundations Social Science Research Network. ,(2007) , 10.2139/SSRN.999874
John Rawls, The Law of Peoples ,(1999)
J. L. Mackie, , Can There Be A Right-Based Moral Theory? Midwest Studies in Philosophy. ,vol. 3, pp. 350- 359 ,(1978) , 10.1111/J.1475-4975.1978.TB00366.X
JULIE A. WHITE, JOAN C. TRONTO, Political Practices of Care: Needs and Rights* Ratio Juris. ,vol. 17, pp. 425- 453 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1467-9337.2004.00276.X