Definition and Reference Framework for Life Cycle Technologies in Life Cycle Engineering - a Case Study on All Solid State Traction Batteries

作者: Christoph Herrmann , Christoph Herrmann , Stefan Blume , Felipe Cerdas , Felipe Cerdas

DOI: 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2021.01.033

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Life cycle engineering (LCE) methods are essential in the development of next generation energy storage systems order to avoid harmful unintended environmental consequences. Moreover, integration life knowledge early stage such technologies can lead improved performance regard their impact. Extensive information from all stages is needed understand interdependencies along cycle, e.g. between required raw materials, applied processing parameters and lifetime behaviour battery. From an LCE perspective, detailed representative inventories for assessment traction batteries a time resource intensive process, which requires difficult synchronization with product activities. A cyber physical Cycle Technologies system offers potential reduce data collection efforts while enhancing its robustness reliability. refer any product- or process- integrated acquisition technology, sensors, be leveraged provide about product’s performance. In this paper, we introduce concept maximize functionality reducing Furthermore, present reference architecture aiming at technologies. Finally, illustrate application case study All Solid State Batteries discuss usability new battery systems.

参考文章(17)
George Psacharopoulos, Zafiris Tzannatos, Overview and methodology pp. 1- ,(1992)
Mathias Svendsen, Mads Winther-Jensen, Anders Bro Pedersen, Peter Bach Andersen, Thomas Meier Sorensen, Electric vehicle data acquisition system ieee international electric vehicle conference. pp. 1- 7 ,(2014) , 10.1109/IEVC.2014.7056140
Christian M. Lastoskie, Qiang Dai, Comparative life cycle assessment of laminated and vacuum vapor-deposited thin film solid-state batteries Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 91, pp. 158- 169 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.12.003
Jamal Hussain Miah, Andrew Griffiths, Ryan McNeill, Sharla Halvorson, Urs Schenker, Namy Espinoza-Orias, Stephen Morse, Aidong Yang, Jhuma Sadhukhan, A framework for increasing the availability of life cycle inventory data based on the role of multinational companies International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 23, pp. 1744- 1760 ,(2018) , 10.1007/S11367-017-1391-Y
Luciano Sánchez, Inés Couso, José Otero, Yuviny Echevarría, David Anseán, A Model-Based Virtual Sensor for Condition Monitoring of Li-Ion Batteries in Cyber-Physical Vehicle Systems Journal of Sensors. ,vol. 2017, pp. 1- 12 ,(2017) , 10.1155/2017/9643279
Alexander Kaluza, Sebastian Gellrich, Felipe Cerdas, Sebastian Thiede, Christoph Herrmann, Life Cycle Engineering Based on Visual Analytics Procedia CIRP. ,vol. 69, pp. 37- 42 ,(2018) , 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2017.11.128
Felipe Cerdas, Sebastian Thiede, Christoph Herrmann, Integrated Computational Life Cycle Engineering — Application to the case of electric vehicles CIRP Annals. ,vol. 67, pp. 25- 28 ,(2018) , 10.1016/J.CIRP.2018.04.052
Christoph Herrmann, Wim Dewulf, Michael Hauschild, Alexander Kaluza, Sami Kara, Steve Skerlos, Life cycle engineering of lightweight structures CIRP Annals. ,vol. 67, pp. 651- 672 ,(2018) , 10.1016/J.CIRP.2018.05.008
Christine Roxanne Hung, Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen, Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, LiSET: A Framework for Early‐Stage Life Cycle Screening of Emerging Technologies Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 24, pp. 26- 37 ,(2020) , 10.1111/JIEC.12807
Azadeh Keshavarzmohammadian, Sherri M. Cook, Jana B. Milford, Cradle-to-gate environmental impacts of sulfur-based solid-state lithium batteries for electric vehicle applications Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 202, pp. 770- 778 ,(2018) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.08.168