The Rawlsian Critique of Utilitarianism: A Luhmannian Interpretation
DOI: 10.1007/S10551-015-2786-Y
关键词:
摘要: The present paper builds on the Rawlsian critique of utilitarianism in order to identify the moral implications of Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. While Luhmann aptly discerned …
unirioja.es
springer.com
researchgate.net 
sci-hub.se 参考文章(54)
Steven E. Wallis, The Complexity of Complexity Theory: An Innovative Analysis Emergence: Complexity and Organization. ,vol. 11, pp. 26- ,(2009)
Norman E. Bowie, Business Ethics in the 21st Century ,(2013)
Johannes Hirata, Happiness, Ethics and Economics ,(2011)
Vladislav Valentinov, Stefan Hielscher, Ingo Pies, Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking Economic Systems. ,vol. 39, pp. 491- 501 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOSYS.2014.12.002
Robert Spaemann, Niklas Luhmann, Paradigm lost : über die ethische Reflexion der Moral : Rede . Niklas Luhmanns Herausforderung der Philosophie : Laudatio Suhrkamp. ,(1990)
Detlef Horster, Niklas Luhmann, Die Moral der Gesellschaft Suhrkamp. ,(2008)
Geoffrey Martin Hodgson, From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics without Homo economicus ,(2012)
Niklas Luhmann, Einführung in die Systemtheorie Carl-Auer-Verlag. ,(2011) , 10.17877/DE290R-5941
K. William Kapp, The Social Costs of Business Enterprise ,(1978)
Vladislav Valentinov, Lioudmila Chatalova, Transaction Costs, Social Costs and Open Systems: Some Common Threads Systems Research and Behavioral Science. ,vol. 31, pp. 316- 326 ,(2014) , 10.1002/SRES.2204