The Complexity of Complexity Theory: An Innovative Analysis

摘要: As more scholars join the conversation around complexity theory (CT), it seems a useful time to ask ourselves if we are talking about "same thing?" This concern is highlighted by present survey, which finds conflict than agreement between definitions. In contrast conflict, path toward common ground may be found applying idea of "robust" theory. A robust expected effective in application and reasonably falsifiable. this paper, Reflexive Dimensional Analysis (RDA) used analyze existing definitions CT. These deconstructed, redefined as scalar dimensions, combined, investigated identify co-causal relationships. The robustness CT identified 0.56 on scale zero one. Paths for advancing suggested, with important implications science. Introduction: Seeking Core Complexity Theory Given breadth, depth, growth current conversation, reasonable - exactly what thing called "complexity theory?" For although there many CT, has been that no unified description (Axelrod 8c Cohen, 2000: 15; Lissack, 1999: 112). While plurality reflect voices engaged also calls into question validity because sense "is." Indeed, general assumption all thing." Like blind men discussing an elephant, such assumptions lead false conclusions unnecessary conflict. academic process thrives differences points view, extent those whether are, indeed, same thing. After all, one author states understood through concepts "A, B, C" while another relevant "C, E, F," some conceptual overlap, but inherent contradictions. Although according their authors, these descriptions fit under rubric seen representing understanding so our systems from atoms institutions. issue body decades. attempt make issue, theories described having "hard core" unchanging assumptions, surrounded changeable "protective belt" (Lakatos, 1970). When challenged, theorist rise defend new concept changes belt, presumably leaves core intact. I seek effort will provide specific support continued development If defined "that generally accepted," might easy define Unfortunately; commonality exist (as explored greater depth below). Some other indicator then needed core. Where social sciences said have highly variable protective belts theory, should noted Ohm's I=E/R use term way physics mathematics, describe where each dimension determined dimensions (this discussed detail article, how shifted shifting obfuscacion Lakatos's outer enduring law. attain level advancement, anticipate meaningful study Leaving lack unquestioned like ignoring fundamental assumptions. And, Lichtenstein (2000a: 539) suggests, ". …