摘要: In the first proceedings of symposium on Epidural Analgesia in Obstetrics1 caesarean section under regional anaesthesia is scarcely mentioned: Crawford2 and Tunstall3 specifically state they do not use an epidural catheter inserted for labour subsequent Moir, 4 describing 1800 epidurals over a 4–5 year period, only performed 30 sections anaesthesia. It would appear that vast majority were conducted with general Steens was particularly scathing about “Paralyse Puff” anaesthetists when he described “the extremely meagre repertoire” who could “perform lumbar puncture, still less epidural, much confidence”. How times change! Now accounts 78% anaesthetics (Shibli KU, Russell IF. A survey anaesthetic techniques used UK 1997. International Journal Obstetric Anesthesia 2000; press) major increase since 1982.6
springer.com
springerlink.com参考文章(82)
Wei Tt, Lin Zf, Lim J, Pan Pm, Tung Mc, The optimal dose of hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica. ,vol. 27, pp. 349- ,(1989)
D. Bruce Scott, Benjamin G. Covino, Handbook of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia Schultz. ,(1985)
A. C. NORTON, A. G. DAVIS, R. J. SPICER, Lignocaine 2% with adrenaline for epidural caesarean section. A comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine. Anaesthesia. ,vol. 43, pp. 844- 849 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2044.1988.TB05597.X
R. S. LAISHLEY, B. M. MORGAN, A single dose epidural technique for caesarean section. A comparison between 0.5% bupivacaine plain and 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline. Anaesthesia. ,vol. 43, pp. 100- 103 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2044.1988.TB05473.X
I.F. RUSSELL, E.L.O. HOLMQVIST, SUBARACHNOID ANALGESIA FOR CAESAREAN SECTION A Double-Blind Comparison of Plain and Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. ,vol. 59, pp. 347- 353 ,(1987) , 10.1093/BJA/59.3.347
A. Gupta, G. Enlund, M. Bengtsson, F. Sjöberg, Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section following epidural analgesia in labour: a relative contraindication. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. ,vol. 3, pp. 153- 156 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0959-289X(94)90229-1
J. L. Westbrook, F. Donald, L. E. S. Carrie, An evaluation of a combined spinal/epidural needle set utilising a 26‐gauge, pencil point spinal needle for Caesarean section Anaesthesia. ,vol. 47, pp. 990- 992 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1365-2044.1992.TB03208.X
DAVID H. SPRAGUE, Effects of position and uterine displacement on spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesthesiology. ,vol. 44, pp. 164- 165 ,(1976) , 10.1097/00000542-197602000-00019
R.R. Gaiser, T.G. Cheek, H.K. Adams, B.B. Gutsche, Epidural lidocaine for cesarean delivery of the distressed fetus International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. ,vol. 7, pp. 27- 31 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80025-3
I.F. Russell, Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at caesarean section under regional block International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. ,vol. 4, pp. 71- 77 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0959-289X(95)82995-M