On the limitations of graph‐theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation

作者: Atte Moilanen

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.02062.X

关键词:

摘要: Summary 1. Applications of graph-theoretic connectivity are increasing at an exponential rate in ecology and conservation. Here, limitations these measures summarized. 2. Graph-theoretic fundamentally limited as they require specification a habitat quality threshold to allow definition patches (nodes). Frequently, second (critical dispersal distance) is applied the identification graph edges. 3. Graph-theoretic poorly applicable large-scale, high-resolution, grid-based data that describe distributions species habitats varying quality. 4. Graph-theoretic primarily concerns emigration-immigration component spatial population-dynamics. Therefore, it cannot alone answer questions about regional population size, resilience or persistence focal species. 5.Synthesis applications: Conservation managers particular should appreciate before applying analysis conservation planning.

参考文章(38)
Justin M. J. Travis, Stephen C. F. Palmer, Aurélie Coulon, Introducing a ‘stochastic movement simulator’ for estimating habitat connectivity Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 2, pp. 258- 268 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2010.00073.X
Jenny A. Hodgson, Atte Moilanen, Brendan A. Wintle, Chris D. Thomas, Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 148- 152 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2010.01919.X
Ilkka Hanski, Otso Ovaskainen, The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape Nature. ,vol. 404, pp. 755- 758 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35008063
EMILY S. MINOR, DEAN L. URBAN, A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning Conservation Biology. ,vol. 22, pp. 297- 307 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2007.00871.X
Atte Moilanen, Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. The American Naturalist. ,vol. 165, pp. 695- 706 ,(2005) , 10.1086/430011
A.G Bunn, D.L Urban, T.H Keitt, Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 59, pp. 265- 278 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEMA.2000.0373
Jenny A. Hodgson, Chris D. Thomas, Brendan A. Wintle, Atte Moilanen, Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 46, pp. 964- 969 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01695.X
Justin M. Calabrese, William F. Fagan, A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 2, pp. 529- 536 ,(2004) , 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2
Andreas Zetterberg, Ulla M. Mörtberg, Berit Balfors, Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 95, pp. 181- 191 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2010.01.002