作者: Gene D. Berry , Salvador M. Aceves
DOI: 10.1021/EF9700947
关键词:
摘要: Three viable technologies for storing hydrogen fuel on cars are currently available: compressed gas, metal hydride adsorption, and cryogenic liquid. However, each of these has significant disadvantages: volume, weight, boiling losses, or energy to compress liquefy the hydrogen. Two alternative approaches analyzed in this paper: pressure vessels with capability a combination liquid storage. These alternatives compared baseline (LH2) storage terms vehicle range, dormancy, required processing, cost. The results indicate that methods can result reduced if packaging is constraint; an extended desirable feature. Cryogenic vessels, one-fifth insulation LH2 systems, have comparable better dormancy than systems. Energy requirements cost appear favorable