Inclusive rigour for complexity

作者: Robert Chambers

DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2015.1068356

关键词:

摘要: Rigour can be reductionist or inclusive. To learn about and understand conditions of complexity, emergence, nonlinearity unpredictability, the inclusive rigour mixed methods has been a step in right direction. From analysis participatory approaches methods, this article postulates canons for research evaluation complexity: eclectic methodological pluralism; improvisation innovation; adaptive iteration; triangulation; plural perspectives; optimal ignorance appropriate imprecision; being open, alert inquisitive. Inclusive is inherent approaches, visualisations, group-visual synergy, democracy ground statistics. Transparent reflexivity, personal behaviour attitudes, good facilitation are fundamental. Fully complexity demands many personal, institutional professional revolutions.

参考文章(31)
Esther Duflo, Bruno Crepon, Xavier Ginéj, Jonathan Zinman, Alix Peterson Zwane, William Pariente, Richard Hornbeck, Michael Kremer, Edward Miguel, Clair Null, Florencia DeVoto, Abhijit Banerjee, Dean Karlan, Eric Van Dusen, The Risk of Asking: Being Surveyed Can Affect Later Behavior Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 108, ,(2011)
Lucia D'Ambruoso, Christer Hogstedt, Zubin Shroff, Asa Christina Laurell, Rene Loewenson, Participatory action research in health systems : a methods reader TARSC, AHPSR, WHO, IDRC Canada, Equinet. ,(2014)
Peter Reason, Hilary Bradbury, Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice Sage. ,(2001)
Robert Chambers, Revolutions in development inquiry ,(2008)
Peter Reason, Hilary Bradbury, The SAGE Handbook of Action Research London: Sage. ,(2008) , 10.4135/9781848607934