Effect of ramp configuration on easiness of handling, heart rate, and behavior of near-market weight pigs at unloading.

作者: S. Goumon , L. Faucitano , R. Bergeron , T. Crowe , M. L. Connor

DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2012-6083

关键词:

摘要: Three experiments, each using 280 pigs, were conducted in a simulated compartment to test the effect of angle entrance (AOE) ramp (90°, 60°, 30°, or 0°), slope (0°, 16°, 21°, 26°), and an initial 20-cm step associated with 16° 21° slopes on ease handling, heart rate (HR), behavior near market-weight pigs during unloading. Heart (pigs handler), unloading time, interventions handler, reactions monitored. The results first experiment show that 90° AOE had detrimental effects handling (P < 0.05), HR pig 0.05). 0° 30° appeared improve unloading, whereas 60° intermediate effect. be preferable, because moved at this balked less frequently 0.01) required manipulation 0.05) than AOE. second use flat led easiest as demonstrated by lower number balks 0.001) when frequent paddle = voice ramp, compared other treatments. However, did not differ from many variables reflecting which may explained difference configuration between ramps. also steepest most balking backing up 0.001), (touches, slaps, pushes; P 0.05 for all) time 0.01). No differences found 26° slope, suggesting length one factors make more difficult. last made physically demanding handler their greater HR. difficulty reluctance move toward suggest perceived psychologically challenging. Making few changes terms design could efficiency reduce stress pigs.

参考文章(18)
Jerry D. Carpenter, Herman F. Mayes, John Albert Hoehne, Corral Systems for Handling and Sorting Hogs University of Missouri Extension. ,(1993)
P. Warriss, E. Bevis, J. Edwards, S. Brown, T. Knowles, Effect of the angle of slope on the ease with which pigs negotiate loading ramps. Veterinary Record. ,vol. 128, pp. 419- 421 ,(1991) , 10.1136/VR.128.18.419
Temple Grandin, The design and construction of facilities for handling cattle Livestock Production Science. ,vol. 49, pp. 103- 119 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00008-0
T. Grandin, Pig behavior studies applied to slaughter-plant design Applied Animal Ethology. ,vol. 9, pp. 141- 151 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90190-0
T. Grandin, Design of loading facilities and holding pens Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 28, pp. 187- 201 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90053-G
P. Warriss, S. Brown, T. Knowles, J. Edwards, Influence of width and bends on the ease of movement of pigs along races Veterinary Record. ,vol. 130, pp. 202- 204 ,(1992) , 10.1136/VR.130.10.202
K.S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, L. Faucitano, S. Dadgar, P. Shand, L.A. González, T.G. Crowe, Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: A review Meat Science. ,vol. 92, pp. 227- 243 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2012.04.010
S.N. Brown, T.G. Knowles, L.J. Wilkins, S.A. Chadd, P.D. Warriss, The response of pigs to being loaded or unloaded onto commercial animal transporters using three systems. Veterinary Journal. ,vol. 170, pp. 91- 100 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.TVJL.2004.05.003
A. V. Weschenfelder, S. Torrey, N. Devillers, T. Crowe, A. Bassols, Y. Saco, M. Piñeiro, L. Saucier, L. Faucitano, Effects of trailer design on animal welfare parameters and carcass and meat quality of three Pietrain crosses being transported over a long distance. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 90, pp. 3220- 3231 ,(2012) , 10.2527/JAS.2012-4676
M. J. Ritter, M. Ellis, R. Bowman, J. Brinkmann, S. E. Curtis, J. M. DeDecker, O. Mendoza, C. M. Murphy, D. G. Orellana, B. A. Peterson, A. Rojo, J. M. Schlipf, B. F. Wolter, Effects of season and distance moved during loading on transport losses of market-weight pigs in two commercially available types of trailer. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 86, pp. 3137- 3145 ,(2008) , 10.2527/JAS.2008-0873