Physical parameter-based allocation for the energy consumption of pyro-metallurgical system—a case study on nickel production in China

作者: Boxue Sun , Yu Liu , Zuoren Nie , Feng Gao , Zhihong Wang

DOI: 10.1007/S11367-016-1144-3

关键词:

摘要: The objectives of this study were to establish an allocation model for the energy consumption pyro-metallurgical system based on physical relationship between input and output, apply established nickel production in China compare difference results derived from traditional models. basic methodological idea is that a multi-output process should be allocated according how consumed process. was decomposed into different categories (e.g. absorption chemical reaction loss), these classified two groups, i.e. dependent product ratio (PRDE) independent (PRIE); then, basis each category determined through metal output. carried out; boundary includes sub-systems (i.e. Ni–Cu coproduction Ni refining system), allocated; data required by compilation LCI mainly obtained literature. processes mining, drying, converting floating-grinding belongs PRIE following principle mass-based allocation, corresponding factors are 64, 69 69 %, respectively. involved smelting (the key demonstrating model) include both PRDE, aggregated factor calculated as 56 %. result lower than market value-based model, because that, desulphurization reactions occurred process, states copper transformed pyrite (CuFeS2) nicopyrite ((Fe,Ni)9S8) cuprous sulphide (Cu2S) (Ni3S2), compound releases more sulphur atoms compound. When analyzing single sensitive selection; however, when comparing or processes, comparison relatively insensitive selection. physical-chemical ways; decomposition significant choosing bases; mass can only used PRIE, same cases without systematic analysis will inappropriate. requirement some nontraditional extra inventory major limitation model. This focused consumes input, patterns other systems taken account future studies.

参考文章(27)
Johannes Jung, Niklas von der Assen, André Bardow, An Uncertainty Assessment Framework for LCA-based Environmental Process Design Computer-aided chemical engineering. ,vol. 32, pp. 937- 942 ,(2013) , 10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50157-3
Gerfried Jungmeier, Frank Werner, Anna Jarnehammar, Catharina Hohenthal, Klaus Richter, Allocation in LCA of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9. Part II. Examples International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 369- 375 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02978686
Mohan Yellishetty, P. G. Ranjith, A. Tharumarajah, Sheshanath Bhosale, Life cycle assessment in the minerals and metals sector: a critical review of selected issues and challenges International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 14, pp. 257- 267 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11367-009-0060-1
Erik Svanes, Mie Vold, Ole Jørgen Hanssen, Effect of different allocation methods on LCA results of products from wild-caught fish and on the use of such results International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 16, pp. 512- 521 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11367-011-0288-4
Lin Luo, Ester van der Voet, Gjalt Huppes, Helias A. Udo de Haes, Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 14, pp. 529- 539 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11367-009-0112-6
Xiao Xiao, Xiao Songwen, Guo Xueyi, Huang Kelong, Yamamoto Ryoichi, LCA Case Study of zinc hydro and pyro-metallurgical process in China International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 151- 155 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978460
Adriana Domínguez, Alicia Valero, Antonio Valero, Exergy accounting applied to metallurgical systems: The case of nickel processing Energy. ,vol. 62, pp. 37- 45 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2013.03.089
Gerfried Jungmeier, Frank Werner, Anna Jarnehammar, Catharina Hohenthal, Klaus Richter, Allocation in lca of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part i. methodology International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 290- 294 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02978890
Nathan Pelletier, Fulvio Ardente, Miguel Brandão, Camillo De Camillis, David Pennington, Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 20, pp. 74- 86 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11367-014-0812-4