How to Detect Deception in Everyday Life and the Reasons Underlying It
作者： sara agosta , patrizia pezzoli , giuseppe sartori
DOI: 10.1002/ACP.2902
关键词:
摘要: Summary The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) evaluates which of two contrasting events is true for an individual on the basis implicit associations and corresponding reaction times in classifying sentences. In this research, white lies reasons to lie were investigated. White are social lies. They widespread our daily lives, business world forensic contexts. The ability deceive essential polite interactions and, at times, self-preservation, but little research was conducted so far type deception. authors tested efficiency aIAT identifying a real reason producing lie, each participant's motivation lying false (faked) one. both cases, differentiated truth from also identified faked one all 20 participants. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
core.ac.uk
sci-hub.se 参考文章(17)
Susan H. Adams, Statement Analysis: What Do Suspects' Words Really Reveal? ,(1996)
Giorgio Ganis, Julian Paul Keenan, The cognitive neuroscience of deception Social Neuroscience. ,vol. 4, pp. 465- 472 ,(2009) , 10.1080/17470910802507660
Sara Agosta, Umberto Castiello, Davide Rigoni, Stefano Lionetti, Giuseppe Sartori, The Detection and the Neural Correlates of Behavioral (Prior) Intentions Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. ,vol. 23, pp. 3888- 3902 ,(2011) , 10.1162/JOCN_A_00039
Giorgio Ganis, Stephen M Kosslyn, Stephen Stose, WL Thompson, Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd, Neural Correlates of Different Types of Deception: An fMRI Investigation Cerebral Cortex. ,vol. 13, pp. 830- 836 ,(2003) , 10.1093/CERCOR/13.8.830
Brian A. Nosek, Anthony G. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. ,vol. 31, pp. 166- 180 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0146167204271418
Frederick Schauer, Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 14, pp. 101- 103 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2009.12.004
Anthony G. Greenwald, Brian A. Nosek, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 85, pp. 197- 216 ,(2003) , 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
Bruno Verschuere, Valentina Prati, Jan De Houwer, Cheating the Lie Detector Faking in the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test Psychological Science. ,vol. 20, pp. 410- 413 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1467-9280.2009.02308.X
Xiaoqing Hu, J. Peter Rosenfeld, Galen V. Bodenhausen, Combating automatic autobiographical associations: the effect of instruction and training in strategically concealing information in the autobiographical implicit association test. Psychological Science. ,vol. 23, pp. 1079- 1085 ,(2012) , 10.1177/0956797612443834
Charles F. Bond, Bella M. DePaulo, Accuracy of Deception Judgments Personality and Social Psychology Review. ,vol. 10, pp. 214- 234 ,(2006) , 10.1207/S15327957PSPR1003_2