Balancing phylogenetic diversity and species numbers in conservation prioritization, using a case study of threatened species in New Zealand

作者: Joseph R. Bennett , Graeme Elliott , Belinda Mellish , Liana N. Joseph , Ayesha I.T. Tulloch

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2014.03.013

关键词:

摘要: Funding for managing threatened species is currently insufficient to assist recovery of all species, so management projects must be prioritized. In attempts maximize phylogenetic diversity conserved, prioritization protocols are increasingly weighting using metrics that incorporate their evolutionary distinctiveness. a case study 700 the most in New Zealand, we examined trade-offs between emphasis on species’ distinctiveness weights, and numbers prioritized, as well costs probabilities success projects. Increasing weights protocol led greater per-species higher risk project failure. realistic, limited-budget scenario, this resulted fewer which imposed limits total could conserved. However, by systematically varying weight were able minimize trade-offs, obtain groups near-optimal both Phylogenetic may not equate perfectly with functional or potential, conservation agencies reluctant sacrifice numbers. Thus, recommend prioritizing achieve an effective balance maximizing number

参考文章(47)
Takashi Negishi, Optimal Allocation of Resources Springer Japan. pp. 109- 126 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-4-431-54535-4_7
R. Hitchmough, P. Cromarty, L. Bull, New Zealand Threat Classification System lists: 2005. New Zealand Threat Classification System lists: 2005.. ,(2007)
Lisa J Dunnett, Ross H Crozier, Paul-Michael Agapow, Phylogenetic biodiversity assessment based on systematic nomenclature Evolutionary Bioinformatics. ,vol. 1, pp. 0- 0 ,(2005) , 10.4137/EBO.S0
Berta Martín-López, Carlos Montes, Lucía Ramírez, Javier Benayas, What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 1370- 1380 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2009.01.030
Robert E. Ricklefs, Mark Pagel, Evolutionary biology: Birds of a feather Nature. ,vol. 491, pp. 336- 337 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NATURE11642
HELENE MARSH, ANDREW DENNIS, HARRY HINES, ALEX KUTT, KEITH McDONALD, ELLEN WEBER, STEPHEN WILLIAMS, JOHN WINTER, Optimizing Allocation of Management Resources for Wildlife Conservation Biology. ,vol. 21, pp. 387- 399 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2006.00589.X
DAN ROSAUER, SHAWN W. LAFFAN, MICHAEL D. CRISP, STEPHEN C. DONNELLAN, LYN G. COOK, Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 18, pp. 4061- 4072 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2009.04311.X
Robbyn J.F. Abbitt, J.Michael Scott, David S. Wilcove, The geography of vulnerability: incorporating species geography and human development patterns into conservation planning Biological Conservation. ,vol. 96, pp. 169- 175 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00064-1
Kerrie A. Wilson, Marissa F. McBride, Michael Bode, Hugh P. Possingham, Prioritizing global conservation efforts Nature. ,vol. 440, pp. 337- 340 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NATURE04366