Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve.

作者: Douglas S. Scherr , Adam Levinson , Jay D. Raman , Steven Dong , David Samadi

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE To report the operative technique, oncologic and therapeutic outcomes, learning curve from our initial series of over 140 patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy. METHODS Between January 2003 May 2005, 143 with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent a Prospective data collection included patient age, body mass index (BMI), clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Operative outcome measures time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications. Post-operative outcomes were length hospital stay, catheter duration, pathology, margin status, biochemical recurrence, return continence. RESULTS Mean time was 241 minutes an EBL 274 mL. Five (3%) required conversion to open surgery. The average hospitalization 1.8 days, Foley catheters removed after 8.9 days. Twenty-four 141 men (17%) had positive surgical margin, decrease 23% in first half experience 11% latter half. Patients extracapsular extension significantly higher rate than did those organ-confined disease (47% vs 15%). Over 40% margins located posteriorly. At mean follow-up 11 months, 96% PSA <0.2 ng/mL. median complete continence 3.5 95% fully continent at 1 year. CONCLUSION Robotic prostatectomy is effective treatment modality for cancer. Although needs be overcome, experienced benefits convalescence early functional comparable approach. Longer-term results are needed; however, encouraging.

参考文章(14)
Mani Menon, Alok Shrivastava, Richard Sarle, Ashok Hemal, Ashutosh Tewari, None, Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: A Single-Team Experience of 100 Cases Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 17, pp. 785- 790 ,(2003) , 10.1089/089277903770802380
Li-Ming Su, Richard E. Link, Sam B. Bhayani, Wendy Sullivan, Christian P. Pavlovich, Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Replicating the open surgical technique Urology. ,vol. 64, pp. 123- 127 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2004.02.010
Patrick C. Walsh, Pieter J. Donker, Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 197, pp. 1005- 1010 ,(1982) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2016.10.105
GARY D. GROSSFELD, JAMES J. CHANG, JEANETTE M. BROERING, DAVE P. MILLER, JENNY YU, SCOTT C. FLANDERS, JAMES M. HENNING, DAVID M. STIER, PETER R. CARROLL, Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 163, pp. 1171- 1177 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67716-6
VIPUL R. PATEL, A.S. TULLY, R. HOLMES, J. LINDSAY, ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING—THE LEARNING CURVE AND BEYOND: INITIAL 200 CASES The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 174, pp. 269- 272 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.JU.0000162082.12962.40
Thomas E Ahlering, Douglas Skarecky, David Lee, Ralph V Clayman, None, Successful Transfer of Open Surgical Skills to a Laparoscopic Environment Using a Robotic Interface: Initial Experience With Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 170, pp. 1738- 1741 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.JU.0000092881.24608.5E
Makoto Ohori, Thomas M Wheeler, Michael W Kattan, Yasuki Goto, Peter T Scardino, None, Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 154, pp. 1818- 1824 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66792-2