摘要: ABSTRACTThis article treats the rise, and perhaps fall, of Design Thinking as a prompt to ask: “What is studies?” or rather, could studies be?” Using heuristic sWOt analysis, it argued that recent shifts in cultural theory toward material practices afford opportunities expand beyond mere liberal arts supplement education designers. However, facing challenges from both discipline business digital interaction design. It consequently concluded needs move its current pluralism.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(80)
Erik Stolterman, Harold G. Nelson, The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World ,(2002)
Bryan Lawson, What designers know ,(2004)
Roberto Verganti, Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean ,(2009)
Tony Fry, Design as Politics ,(2010)
Sianne Ngai, Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting ,(2012)
Robert Grudin, Design and Truth ,(2010)
Hans Achterhuis, American Philosophy and Technology; The Empirical Turn. Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology. ,(2001)
Bill Brown, A Sense of Things University of Chicago Press. ,(2003) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226076317.001.0001
Prasad Boradkar, Designing Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects ,(2010)
Giorgio Agamben, Stefan Pedatella, David Kishik, What Is an Apparatus? and Other Essays ,(2009)