Dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome: results of 411 procedures with special reference to technique, efficacy, and complications.

作者: Joachim Oertel , Henry W.S. Schroeder , Michael R. Gaab

DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223500.25131.99

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic release of carpal tunnel syndrome is still under debate. The main advantages the technique are considered to be minor postoperative pain and a more rapid recovery. Disadvantages thought impossibility direct median nerve neurolysis higher surgical complication rate, including injury nerve. METHODS: results 411 consecutive endoscopic procedures performed between March 1995 September 2004 presented. All patients were prospectively followed. RESULTS: In present series, success rate 98.05% was observed. There no permanent morbidity and, in particular, there four (0.97%) patients, preoperative symptoms did not improve. two (0.49%) these an incomplete ligament occurred. another (0.97%), switch open surgery required. CONCLUSION: data prove that safe reliable for surgery. do support current discussion risk with Thus, our group, represents therapy choice primary idiopathic syndrome.

参考文章(44)
Thomas E. Trumble, Edward Diao, Reid A. Abrams, Mary M. Gilbert-Anderson, Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release : a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 84, pp. 1107- 1115 ,(2002) , 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00003
Brief Lp, Brief R, Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: report of 146 cases. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 67, pp. 274- 277 ,(2000)
Hiroyuki Hashizume, Hajime Inoue, Masuo Senda, Akira Kawai, Kenya Hasegawa, Evaluation of release surgery for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic versus open method. Acta Medica Okayama. ,vol. 53, pp. 179- 183 ,(1999) , 10.18926/AMO/31614
Kathryn A. Stolp-Smith, Melinda K Pascoe, Paul L. Ogburn, Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: Frequency, severity, and prognosis Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 79, pp. 1285- 1287 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90276-3
N. L. B. SAW, S. JONES, L. SHEPSTONE, M. MEYER, P. G. CHAPMAN, A. M. LOGAN, Early Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Prospective Trial Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 28, pp. 444- 449 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00097-4
John M. Agee, H. Relton McCarroll, Richard D. Tortosa, Donald A. Berry, Robert M. Szabo, Clayton A. Peimer, Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 17, pp. 987- 995 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0363-5023(09)91044-9
Dina L. Hulsizer, Michael P. Staebler, Arnold-Peter C. Weiss, Edward Akelman, The results of revision carpal tunnel release following previous open versus endoscopic surgery Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 23, pp. 865- 869 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80164-0
George S. Phalen, Reflections on 21 Years' Experience With the Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 212, pp. 1365- 1367 ,(1970) , 10.1001/JAMA.1970.03170210069012
Andrew V. Cavallo, Philip G. Slattery, Richard J. Barton, Endoscopic carpal tunnel release and congenital anomalies of the median nerve. Hand Surgery. ,vol. 8, pp. 265- 270 ,(2003) , 10.1142/S0218810403001753
Andrew K. Palmer, David A. Toivonen, Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 24, pp. 561- 565 ,(1999) , 10.1053/JHSU.1999.0561